Skip to content

Conversation

@resyntax-ci
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 6 files.

  • Fixed 7 occurrences of provide/contract-to-contract-out
  • Fixed 3 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of map-to-for
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of if-begin-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of or-hash-ref-set!-to-hash-ref!
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of cond-let-to-cond-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of arrow-contract-with-rest-to-arrow-contract-with-ellipses
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-syntax-syntax-rules-to-define-syntax-rule

resyntax-ci bot added 9 commits March 12, 2025 00:17
The `provide/contract` form is a legacy form made obsolete by `contract-out`.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
…ellipses`

This `->*` contract can be rewritten using `->` with ellipses.
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary
This `define-syntax` macro can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `define-syntax-rule` macro.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This expression can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `hash-ref!` expression.
@mflatt
Copy link
Member

mflatt commented Jun 26, 2025

Conflicts with newer merges.

@mflatt mflatt closed this Jun 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant