-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
Automated Resyntax fixes #1418
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Automated Resyntax fixes #1418
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Specify a line mode of `'any` with `read-line` to avoid differences between Windows and other platforms.
Keep imports in `require` sorted and grouped by phase, with collections before files.
This `match` expression can be simplified using `match-define`.
Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
This `let` expression can be pulled up into a `define` expression.
This definition is not used.
This negated `unless` expression can be replaced by a `when` expression.
The `syntax-disarm` function is a legacy function that does nothing.
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
The `define` form supports a shorthand for defining functions.
Using `when` and `unless` is simpler than a conditional with an always-throwing branch.
This lambda function is equivalent to the built-in `positive?` predicate.
This `for/fold` loop can be simplified by using the `#:unless` keyword.
This variable is returned immediately and can be inlined.
Contributor
|
This failed because of jackfirth/resyntax#410. Closing. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resyntax fixed 50 issues in 18 files.
tidy-requirelet-to-definedefine-lambda-to-defineunused-definitionread-line-anysingle-clause-match-to-match-defineif-let-to-condif-begin-to-condmap-to-foralways-throwing-cond-to-whensyntax-disarm-migrationzero-comparison-lambda-to-positive?inverted-unlessdefine-let-to-double-defineinline-unnecessary-definefor/fold-with-conditional-body-to-unless-keyword