Skip to content

Conversation

@resyntax-ci
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Resyntax fixed 50 issues in 16 files.

  • Fixed 11 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 8 occurrences of single-clause-match-to-match-define
  • Fixed 6 occurrences of define-syntax-syntax-rules-to-define-syntax-rule
  • Fixed 3 occurrences of quasiquote-to-list
  • Fixed 3 occurrences of if-else-false-to-and
  • Fixed 3 occurrences of sort-with-keyed-comparator-to-sort-by-key
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of zero-comparison-to-positive?
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of always-throwing-if-to-when
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-simple-macro-to-define-syntax-parse-rule
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of when-expression-in-for-loop-to-when-keyword
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of for/fold-result-keyword
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-let-to-double-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of apply-append-for-loop-to-for-loop
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of inverted-when
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of apply-flattening
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of inline-unnecessary-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-lambda-to-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-values-values-to-define

resyntax-ci bot added 19 commits January 31, 2025 00:27
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This `define-syntax` macro can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `define-syntax-rule` macro.
This `if` expression can be refactored to an equivalent expression using `and`.
This negated `when` expression can be replaced by an `unless` expression.
This expression is equivalent to calling the `positive?` predicate.
This `sort` expression can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent expression.
This `match` expression can be simplified using `match-define`.
The `define-simple-macro` form has been renamed to `define-syntax-parse-rule`.
Using `when` and `unless` is simpler than a conditional with an always-throwing branch.
The `define` form supports a shorthand for defining functions.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
The `apply` function accepts single arguments in addition to a trailing list argument.
This variable is returned immediately and can be inlined.
This `let` expression can be pulled up into a `define` expression.
This quasiquotation is equialent to a simple `list` call.
This use of `define-values` is unnecessary.
Only one of the `for/fold` expression's result values is used. Use the `#:result` keyword to return just that result.
Instead of using `(apply append ...)` to flatten a list of lists, consider using `for*/list` to flatten the list.
Use the `#:when` keyword instead of `when` to reduce loop body indentation.
@samth samth closed this Jun 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants