[CI] Test the compilation of GALAHAD with nvfortran

[amontoison]

It's failing when I compile CUTEst not GALAHAD.
Relate PR: ralna/CUTEst#76

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.48%. Comparing base (4e04b5a) to head (7884dd2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #345   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   43.48%   43.48%           
=======================================
  Files         314      314           
  Lines      162610   162610           
  Branches    56355    56355           
=======================================
  Hits        70706    70706           
  Misses      74220    74220           
  Partials    17684    17684           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[amontoison]

@jfowkes
In the ticket that you opened for NVIDIA, can you also suggest them to try the compilation of CUTEst and GALAHAD?
We also have internal compiler errors...

[jfowkes]

Sure, but could you point me to the failing CI for CUTEst and GALAHAD? They need to be able to reproduce the failures.

[amontoison]

• CUTEst: https://github.com/ralna/CUTEst/actions/runs/14238345995/job/39902270932?pr=76
• GALAHAD: https://github.com/ralna/GALAHAD/actions/runs/14410898110/job/40418312176

[jfowkes]

Looks like these bugs have already been filed:
https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/nvfortran-s-0034-syntax-error-at-or-near/232230
https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/howto-build-openmpi-with-nvhpc-24-1/283219
Of course reporting a bug is no guarantee that Nvidia will actually fix it.