Skip to content

Conversation

@kilograham
Copy link
Contributor

Most of the PIO examples listed in the README did not match the actual name of the executable, so cleaning that up.

Also there was a use of a non-interface library which was arguably incorrect, and certainly not, i think, worth introducing there

@kilograham kilograham added this to the 2.2.0 milestone Jul 24, 2025
@kilograham kilograham changed the base branch from master to develop July 24, 2025 23:11
@kilograham
Copy link
Contributor Author

possibly time for some @lurch script magic!

@lurch
Copy link
Contributor

lurch commented Jul 24, 2025

possibly time for some @lurch script magic!

Hahaha, if only I had more spare time 😢

Copy link
Contributor

@will-v-pi will-v-pi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missed a couple (assuming the intention is that names in README should match TARGET names, which I agree with)

Also, while cleaning up, could you delete the space after add_executable before the bracket at the top of pio/ir_nec/ir_loopback/CMakeLists.txt (currently says add_executable (pio_ir_loopback ..., would be better as add_executable(pio_ir_loopback ...)

@kilograham kilograham requested a review from will-v-pi July 25, 2025 14:24
kilograham and others added 2 commits July 25, 2025 09:34
@kilograham kilograham merged commit b019767 into develop Jul 25, 2025
4 checks passed
@kilograham kilograham deleted the cleanup branch July 25, 2025 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants