Skip to content

Conversation

@AndySung320
Copy link
Contributor

Why are these changes needed?

This PR adds an e2e test covering RayCronJob suspend/resume behavior:

  • When spec.suspend=true, the RayCronJob controller should not create any new RayJobs even after the scheduled time passes.
  • After setting spec.suspend=false, the controller should resume scheduling and start creating RayJobs again.

To run this e2e test in CI, we also enable the RayCronJob feature gate in the test/CI-only operator overrides (Helm values override and kustomize test override).

Note: RayCronJob previously did not have // +genclient, so the typed client/applyconfiguration for RayCronJob was not generated. The PR adds +genclient and commits the resulting regenerated clientset/applyconfiguration/informer/lister code so the test can compile and run consistently.

Related issue number

Closes #4323

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Copy link
Contributor

@seanlaii seanlaii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

//+kubebuilder:printcolumn:name="age",type="date",JSONPath=".metadata.creationTimestamp",priority=0
//+kubebuilder:printcolumn:name="suspend",type=boolean,JSONPath=".spec.suspend",priority=0

// +genclient
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!
Maybe we can also add the following annotations as well:

// +kubebuilder:storageversion
// +kubebuilder:resource:categories=all

g.Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
ownerUID := rcj.UID

// No RayJob should be created
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit:

Suggested change
// No RayJob should be created
// No RayJob should be created
LogWithTimestamp(test.T(), "Waiting to ensure no RayJobs are created while suspended")

return n
}, 130*time.Second, 5*time.Second).Should(Equal(0))

// Resume
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit:

Suggested change
// Resume
LogWithTimestamp(test.T(), "Resuming RayCronJob %s/%s", rayCronJob.Namespace, rayCronJob.Name)

Comment on lines +89 to +92
if err != nil {
return -1
}
return n
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To preserve error:

Suggested change
if err != nil {
return -1
}
return n
g.Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
return n


// Spec.suspend should be false
g.Eventually(func() bool {
rcj, err := test.Client().Ray().RayV1().RayCronJobs(namespace.Name).Get(test.Ctx(), rayCronJob.Name, metav1.GetOptions{})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can replace this with a util function similar to GetRayJob.

@Future-Outlier
Copy link
Member

cursor review

Copy link

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Bugbot reviewed your changes and found no bugs!

Copy link
Member

@Future-Outlier Future-Outlier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @machichima @CheyuWu @justinyeh1995 @fscnick to take a look, thank you!

@Future-Outlier Future-Outlier moved this from can be merged to Todo in @Future-Outlier's kuberay project Jan 7, 2026
@CheyuWu CheyuWu self-requested a review January 7, 2026 16:33
Comment on lines +20 to +54
func rayCronJobACTemplate(name, namespace, schedule string) *rayv1ac.RayCronJobApplyConfiguration {
return rayv1ac.RayCronJob(name, namespace).
WithSpec(
rayv1ac.RayCronJobSpec().
WithSchedule(schedule).
WithJobTemplate(
rayv1ac.RayJobSpec().
WithEntrypoint("sleep 1").
WithRayClusterSpec(
rayv1ac.RayClusterSpec().
WithHeadGroupSpec(
rayv1ac.HeadGroupSpec().
WithTemplate(
corev1ac.PodTemplateSpec().
WithSpec(
corev1ac.PodSpec().
WithContainers(
corev1ac.Container().
WithName("ray-head").
WithImage(GetRayImage()).
WithResources(
corev1ac.ResourceRequirements().
WithRequests(corev1.ResourceList{
corev1.ResourceCPU: resource.MustParse("500m"),
corev1.ResourceMemory: resource.MustParse("500Mi"),
}),
),
),
),
),
),
),
),
)
}
Copy link
Contributor

@justinyeh1995 justinyeh1995 Jan 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: for readability, would it make sense to construct it bottom-up using intermediate variables?

For example

func rayCronJobACTemplate(name, namespace, schedule string) *rayv1ac.RayCronJobApplyConfiguration {
	headContainer := corev1ac.Container().
		WithName("ray-head").
		WithImage(GetRayImage()).
		WithResources(
			corev1ac.ResourceRequirements().
				WithRequests(corev1.ResourceList{
					corev1.ResourceCPU:    resource.MustParse("500m"),
					corev1.ResourceMemory: resource.MustParse("500Mi"),
				}),
		)

	podTmpl := corev1ac.PodTemplateSpec().
		WithSpec(corev1ac.PodSpec().WithContainers(headContainer))

	cluster := ...
	job := ...
	spec := ...

	return rayv1ac.RayCronJob(name, namespace).WithSpec(spec)
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Test] [RayCronJob] Add e2e tests for suspend behavior

4 participants