Skip to content

Conversation

li-jia-nan
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 27, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
dialog Error Error Sep 27, 2025 6:28pm

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@li-jia-nan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 19 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acf2569 and 501088e.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/Dialog/Content/Panel.tsx (5 hunks)
  • src/Dialog/Content/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/Dialog/Mask.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/Dialog/index.tsx (3 hunks)
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch clsx-update

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @li-jia-nan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a performance optimization by migrating the project's class name utility from classnames to clsx. This change involves updating the package.json to reflect the new dependency and subsequently refactoring the relevant React components to utilize the clsx function for dynamic class assignments, aiming for a more lightweight and potentially faster solution.

Highlights

  • Dependency Update: The classnames package has been uninstalled and replaced with clsx in the project dependencies.
  • Code Refactoring: All instances where classnames was used to conditionally join CSS classes have been updated to use clsx instead across several Dialog components.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Addedclsx@​2.1.11001009678100

View full report

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.46%. Comparing base (acf2569) to head (501088e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #512   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.46%   98.46%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         195      195           
  Branches       68       68           
=======================================
  Hits          192      192           
  Misses          3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request replaces the classnames library with clsx for a performance improvement. The changes are straightforward and correctly applied across the codebase. I've made a few suggestions to improve import consistency, but overall this is a good change.

@li-jia-nan li-jia-nan merged commit e6d5337 into master Sep 28, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@li-jia-nan li-jia-nan deleted the clsx-update branch September 28, 2025 06:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant