-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
added support for passing backend url to ReclaimClient constructor #7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe changes make the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ReclaimClient
participant Utils
participant Backend
Client->>ReclaimClient: new ReclaimClient(appBackendUrl?)
Client->>ReclaimClient: zkFetch()
ReclaimClient->>Utils: sendLogs({..., appBackendUrl})
Utils->>Utils: fetchAppById(appId, appBackendUrl)
Utils->>Backend: GET appBackendUrl/app/{appId}
Backend-->>Utils: App data
Utils-->>ReclaimClient: sendLogs result
ReclaimClient-->>Client: zkFetch result
Poem
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Style