-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Revert "feat: delete action.yml" #306
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughA new GitHub Action definition is added to enable queensac as a reusable workflow component. The action installs the queensac Rust binary via cargo and executes it with configurable inputs for repository, branch, dry-run mode, and GitHub App authentication credentials. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR reverts the deletion of action.yml, restoring the GitHub Action definition that allows queensac to be used as a composite action in GitHub workflows. This enables users to integrate the link checker directly into their CI/CD pipelines.
- Restores the complete GitHub Action configuration with input definitions for repo, branch, dry-run mode, and GitHub App credentials
- Re-adds the composite action workflow with two steps: installing queensac and running the link checker
- Enables the action to be referenced in workflows as shown in the README documentation
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
action.yml (1)
18-23: Minor observation: Consider documenting the relationship between auth inputs. Thegithub_app_idandgithub_app_private_keyinputs are independent, but in practice they likely need to be provided together for the action to work as intended. Consider adding a note in thedescriptionfields or in upstream documentation that these two inputs should both be provided or both omitted.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
action.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reddevilmidzy
Repo: reddevilmidzy/queensac PR: 226
File: src/main.rs:21-32
Timestamp: 2025-09-22T15:50:19.531Z
Learning: User reddevilmidzy prefers to communicate in Korean and likes to keep PR scope focused and well-defined.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Upload results
- GitHub Check: Analyze (rust)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
action.yml (1)
1-56: This is well-crafted GitHub Action code. The implementation follows GitHub Actions best practices: proper error handling withset -eo pipefail, correct use of contexts and theGITHUB_PATHenvironment variable, secure secret handling, and clean bash scripting with proper quoting and array expansion.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19429518610Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Reverts #305
resolve: #299
Summary by CodeRabbit
queensacGitHub Action for repository scanning and automated pull request workflows.