Skip to content

Conversation

@pabel-rh
Copy link
Member

@pabel-rh pabel-rh commented Feb 11, 2025

IMPORTANT: Do Not Merge - To be merged by Docs Team Only

Version(s):
main, 1.5
Add the relevant labels to the Pull Request.
Issue:
RHIDP-5514
Preview link:
https://redhat-developer.github.io/red-hat-developers-documentation-rhdh/pr-925/customizing/#configuring-a-floating-action-button

@rhdh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

rhdh-bot commented Feb 11, 2025

@debsmita1
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Feb 12, 2025
@pabel-rh pabel-rh added Technical review done ⛅ Any procedure has been succesfully tested and removed Technical review needed 🔩 Test all the procedures labels Feb 13, 2025
Copy link
Member

@christoph-jerolimov christoph-jerolimov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @pabel-rh, hi @debsmita1,

thanks for this. It's great to have it. But one small and one medium request:

I personally would not use the term onClick. It's really technical and then customers can not use this.

And I don't think we should document the "static way" to use the global floating action button. From my understanding, that's not an option for RHDH customers.

For engineers and the upstream community, we should provide a good plugin README and maybe a (tech) docs folder in the plugin.

@themr0c themr0c removed the lgtm label Feb 17, 2025
@pabel-rh pabel-rh added Technical review needed 🔩 Test all the procedures and removed Technical review done ⛅ Any procedure has been succesfully tested labels Feb 18, 2025
@linfraze
Copy link
Member

linfraze commented Feb 18, 2025

@pabel-rh can you please paste the deep preview link(s) in the PR description so they are easy to find and review? :)

Copy link
Member

@linfraze linfraze left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few considerations

@debsmita1
Copy link
Member

LGTM!
Thanks @pabel-rh !

@pabel-rh pabel-rh added Technical review done ⛅ Any procedure has been succesfully tested Ready to merge 💂 and removed do-no-merge/review-in-progress 👀 Technical review needed 🔩 Test all the procedures labels Mar 12, 2025
@debsmita1 debsmita1 self-requested a review March 12, 2025 13:23
Copy link
Member

@debsmita1 debsmita1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Mar 12, 2025
@jmagak jmagak merged commit 53184bc into redhat-developer:main Mar 13, 2025
3 checks passed
@jmagak
Copy link
Member

jmagak commented Mar 13, 2025

/cherry-pick release-1.5

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jmagak: new pull request created: #981

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants