fix(e2e): extension e2e test should not check for a specific version

[sanketpathak]

Description

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHIDP-11263

Please explain the changes you made here.

Which issue(s) does this PR fix

• Fixes #?

PR acceptance criteria

Please make sure that the following steps are complete:

• GitHub Actions are completed and successful
• Unit Tests are updated and passing
• E2E Tests are updated and passing
• Documentation is updated if necessary (requirement for new features)
• Add a screenshot if the change is UX/UI related

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign albarbaro for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• e2e-tests/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[rhdh-qodo-merge]

ⓘ Your approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🎫 Ticket compliance analysis 🔶 RHIDP-11263 - Partially compliant Compliant requirements: Replace the hard-coded version assertion with a regex-based version assertion. Non-compliant requirements: Requires further human verification: Confirm the updated regex assertion is stable in CI and does not introduce flakiness (e.g., matching an unintended version elsewhere on the page).

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Test Robustness The regex-based locator may match any semantic version-like string anywhere in the table/page, not necessarily the version cell for the intended extension row. Consider scoping the locator to the specific row (e.g., techdocsRow.getByRole("cell", { name: /.../ })) or anchoring the regex (/^\d+\.\d+\.\d+$/) to reduce false positives. await expect( page.getByRole("cell", { name: "Frontend plugin module" }), ).toBeVisible(); await expect(page.getByRole("cell", { name: /(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)/ })).toBeVisible();

📄 References redhat-developer/rhdh/e2e-tests/playwright/e2e/github-happy-path.spec.ts [14-229] redhat-developer/rhdh/e2e-tests/playwright/e2e/auth-providers/oidc.spec.ts [21-454]

[rhdh-qodo-merge]

ⓘ Your approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan

PR Type

Tests

---

Description

• Replace hardcoded version check with regex pattern matching

• Allow e2e test to pass with any semantic version format

• Improve test robustness by removing version-specific assertions

---

File Walkthrough

	Relevant files
Tests	extensions.spec.ts Use regex pattern for version validation in test                  e2e-tests/playwright/e2e/extensions.spec.ts Changed version assertion from exact match "1.1.30" to regex pattern /(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)/ Allows test to pass with any semantic version format instead of failing on version changes Improves test maintainability by decoupling from specific version numbers +1/-1

---

[rhdh-qodo-merge]

ⓘ Your approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
General	Anchor version regex Improve the version-matching regex by anchoring it with ^ and $ and removing unnecessary capturing groups to ensure an exact match and prevent partial matches. e2e-tests/playwright/e2e/extensions.spec.ts [524] -await expect(page.getByRole("cell", { name: /(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)/ })).toBeVisible(); +await expect(page.getByRole("cell", { name: /^\d+\.\d+\.\d+$/ })).toBeVisible(); Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: The suggestion correctly improves the test's precision by anchoring the regular expression to match the entire cell content, preventing potential false positives from partial matches.	Low
Update

[github-actions]

The image is available at:

• quay.io/rhdh-community/rhdh:pr-4053
• quay.io/rhdh-community/rhdh:pr-4053-302a8626

[github-actions]

🚫 Image Push Skipped.

The container image push was skipped because the build was skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image)

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[openshift-ci]

@sanketpathak: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-ocp-helm	53091fc	link	true	/test e2e-ocp-helm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.