Skip to content

Remove stale benchmark_operator_id and benchmark_wrapper_id from update_ci_status#1189

Open
arpsharm wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-update-ci-status
Open

Remove stale benchmark_operator_id and benchmark_wrapper_id from update_ci_status#1189
arpsharm wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-update-ci-status

Conversation

@arpsharm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@arpsharm arpsharm commented Apr 9, 2026

Type of change

  • bug

Description

update_ci_status() in main.py still passed benchmark_operator_id and benchmark_wrapper_id to the method in workloads_operations.py, but those parameters were removed in PR #1186 . This causes a TypeError at runtime when ci_status is pass or failed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 9, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: arpsharm
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ebattat for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@arpsharm arpsharm marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2026 11:09
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from RobertKrawitz and ebattat April 9, 2026 11:09
@arpsharm arpsharm changed the title Remove stale benchmark_operator_id and benchmark_wrapper_id from upda… Remove stale benchmark_operator_id and benchmark_wrapper_id from update_ci_status Apr 9, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ebattat ebattat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it the only place we use it ?

benchmark_runner_id=benchmark_runner_id,
benchmark_operator_id=benchmark_operator_id,
benchmark_wrapper_id=benchmark_wrapper_id)
benchmark_runner_id=benchmark_runner_id)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it the only place we use benchmark_operator_id and benchmark_wrapper_id ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes it was the only file being directly affected at runtime. However, there were stale references as well set in the yaml files, usually harmless but I removed that from there as well just to be consistent.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can u remove it from jenkinsfiles also ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see any more references for this in Jenkinsfiles. Am I missing something?

@arpsharm arpsharm force-pushed the fix-update-ci-status branch from 9bcf527 to af9b03e Compare April 9, 2026 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants