-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
DOC-4647 updated supported sources table with AWS RDS details #974
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5da3f69
DOC-4647 updated supported sources table with AWS RDS details
andy-stark-redis eefbdd9
DOC-4647 updates based on feedback and added embed for version table
andy-stark-redis 21ab27d
DOC-4647 implemented feedback
andy-stark-redis e55b3bc
Update content/embeds/rdi-supported-source-versions.md
andy-stark-redis File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
| | Database | Versions | Versions for Amazon RDS | | ||
| | :-------------------------- | :--------------------- | :-- | | ||
| | Oracle | 12c, 19c, 21c | 19c, 21c | | ||
| | MariaDB | 10.5, 11.4.3 | 10.4 to 10.11, 11.4.3 | | ||
| | MySQL | 5.7, 8.0.x, 8.2 | 8.0.x | | ||
| | Postgres | 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 | 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 | | ||
| | SQL Server | 2017, 2019, 2022 | 2016, 2017, 2019, 2022 | | ||
| | Google Cloud SQL MySQL | 8.0 | None | | ||
| | Google Cloud SQL Postgres | 15 | None | | ||
| | Google Cloud SQL SQL Server | 2019 | None | | ||
| | Google Cloud AlloyDB for PostgreSQL | | None | | ||
| | AWS Aurora/PostgreSQL | 15 | 15 | |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The table is inconsistent now in structure. RDS is a column while google sqls are rows
We can decide we make all cloud support columns and types of database are rows. that's ok
In this case google versions will move to the right of RDS
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yaronp68 OK, I've tidied it up. Also, I based the AlloyDB version info on the table here.