Skip to content

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 8, 2017

@ghost ghost force-pushed the 18159 branch 4 times, most recently from 9884e41 to 254193b Compare November 9, 2017 11:12
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 9, 2017

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@c634352). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 93.67%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master       #5   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   91.58%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      153           
  Lines             ?    51250           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    46938           
  Misses            ?     4312           
  Partials          ?        0
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.44% <93.47%> (?)
#single 40.67% <32.6%> (?)
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/indexes/numeric.py 97.26% <ø> (ø)
pandas/core/window.py 96.37% <ø> (ø)
pandas/util/testing.py 82.01% <ø> (ø)
pandas/core/tools/datetimes.py 84.43% <ø> (ø)
pandas/tseries/offsets.py 96.9% <ø> (ø)
pandas/util/_test_decorators.py 95.23% <ø> (ø)
pandas/io/gbq.py 25% <ø> (ø)
pandas/io/clipboards.py 100% <ø> (ø)
pandas/tseries/holiday.py 93.1% <ø> (ø)
pandas/compat/pickle_compat.py 75.6% <ø> (ø)
... and 46 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c634352...03b2f6b. Read the comment docs.

return (isinstance(element, (float, int, np.floating, np.int_)) and
not isinstance(element, (bool, np.bool_, datetime, timedelta,
return (
isinstance(element, (float, int, np.floating, np.int_, np.long))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see you have addd np.long here. What do you think about adding a test for that case, exactly same as in original issue on Github?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@ghost ghost force-pushed the 18159 branch 2 times, most recently from 47406dd to 998ee68 Compare November 13, 2017 11:58
@ppolewicz
Copy link

Squash commits please, then proceed with PR to upstream.

@ghost ghost force-pushed the 18159 branch 4 times, most recently from 54303dd to 7380624 Compare November 20, 2017 14:12
@gkonefal-reef gkonefal-reef force-pushed the 18159 branch 3 times, most recently from c21485f to 7474a3b Compare November 22, 2017 19:28
AaronCritchley and others added 5 commits December 3, 2017 10:26
closes pandas-dev#18113

Author: Grzegorz Konefał <[email protected]>
Author: Krzysztof Chomski <[email protected]>

Closes pandas-dev#18448 from gkonefal-reef/GH18113 and squashes the following commits:

21cbe79 [Grzegorz Konefał] Comments applied
290b49c [Krzysztof Chomski] BLD: since we already use setuptools, let's remove the optional logic in setup.py (GH18113).
@gkonefal-reef gkonefal-reef force-pushed the 18159 branch 2 times, most recently from fdef49a to fe7360c Compare December 3, 2017 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: fillna maximum recursion depth exceeded in cmp