-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
docs: Community background and forum discussion index #33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
glandua
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
docs/community-alignment-evidence
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ | ||||||||||||||
| # Community Background & Forum Discussion Index | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Purpose | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| This document provides the community context and alignment evidence behind the PoA migration and economic reboot mechanisms (M012–M015). The mechanism specs are technically precise but lack the 2+ years of community deliberation history that grounds them. Reviewers and new contributors need this context. | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| --- | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Timeline of Community PoA Discussions | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| | Date | Event | Forum Thread | | ||||||||||||||
| |------|-------|--------------| | ||||||||||||||
| | Apr 2021 | Mainnet launch with 50 validators (PoS) | — | | ||||||||||||||
| | Jul 2021 | Proposal #3: Increase validator seats to 75 | [#256](https://forum.regen.network/t/proposal-3-increase-validators-seats/256) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Jan 2024 | "Lowering Inflation" proposal passed | Tokenomics WG | | ||||||||||||||
| | Mar 2024 | Proposal #41: Halving REGEN inflation adopted | Tokenomics WG | | ||||||||||||||
| | Jun 2024 | **PoA Consensus RFC posted** — first formal proposal | [#70](https://forum.regen.network/t/regen-network-proof-of-authority-consensus-rfc/70) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Jul 2024 | Cosmos Shared Security RFC (ICS alternative explored) | [#67](https://forum.regen.network/t/cosmos-shared-security-rfc/67) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Jul 2024 | Cross-chain ecoLedger integration — validator competence concerns raised | [#55](https://forum.regen.network/t/cross-chain-integration-with-ecoledger/55) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Mid-2024 | PoA socialized with existing validators | (Telegram/calls) | | ||||||||||||||
| | 2024 | RFC: Reduce validator set from 75 to 21 | [#59](https://forum.regen.network/t/rfc-proposal-draft-to-reduce-active-validator-set-to-21-validators/59) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Feb 2025 | Fixed Cap, Dynamic Supply proposal posted | [#34](https://forum.regen.network/t/fixed-cap-dynamic-supply/34) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Oct 2025 | Governance findings audit published | [#539](https://forum.regen.network/t/regen-s-governance-findings-for-decentralized-and-regenerative-daos/539) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Oct 2025 | Tokenomics architecture checklist summary | [#538](https://forum.regen.network/t/regens-tokenomics-architecture-checklist-summary/538) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Dec 2025 | **Economic Reboot Roadmap v0.1** — 4 workstreams synthesized | [#567](https://forum.regen.network/t/regen-economic-reboot-roadmap-v0-1/567) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Jan 2026 | **Comprehensive Governance & Economic Architecture Upgrade** drafted | [Notion](https://www.notion.so/Draft-Comprehensive-Proposal-Regen-Network-Governance-Economic-Architecture-Upgrade-2fb25b77eda180af8742debdfaed0b3c) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Jan 2026 | Tokenomics WG discusses 3 PoA options; Gregory confirms 18 months of prior socialization | [#19/64](https://forum.regen.network/t/regen-tokenomics-wg/19/64) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Jan 2026 | Gregory references Cosmos Labs native PoA tooling | [#567/4](https://forum.regen.network/t/regen-economic-reboot-roadmap-v0-1/567/4) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Feb 2026 | **Regen Ledger v7.0** ships (SDK v0.53.4) — one version from native PoA | [#574](https://forum.regen.network/t/software-upgrade-proposal-regen-ledger-v7-0/574) | | ||||||||||||||
| | Feb 2026 | agentic-tokenomics repo created with M012–M015 specs | This repo | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| --- | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Key Community Positions | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ### Will Szal (Regen Foundation) | ||||||||||||||
| - Original PoA proposal author (June 2024) | ||||||||||||||
| - Proposed: 7 validators, halt emissions, maintain permissionless governance | ||||||||||||||
| - Emphasized pre-vote socialization with validators | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ### Gregory Landua (RND) | ||||||||||||||
| - Suggested 11–17 validators (decentralization value) | ||||||||||||||
| - Characterized PoA as return to founding vision: Regen was originally a "consortium blockchain model where a group of trusted entities would run the chain" | ||||||||||||||
| - Confirmed 18+ months of community discussion by January 2026 | ||||||||||||||
| - Referenced Cosmos Labs native PoA tooling | ||||||||||||||
| - Leans toward contributor-first fee distribution (Model B) over burn-heavy model | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ### Max Semenchuk (Tokenomics WG Steward) | ||||||||||||||
| - Led WG since August 2023 | ||||||||||||||
| - Authored original PoA RFC analysis (pros/cons) | ||||||||||||||
| - Drove Fixed Cap Dynamic Supply initiative with BlockScience | ||||||||||||||
| - Coordinated Shared Security RFC exploration | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ### brawlaphant (Community) | ||||||||||||||
| - Authored Economic Reboot Roadmap synthesizing all workstreams | ||||||||||||||
| - Created the agentic-tokenomics repo structure and meta-pack | ||||||||||||||
| - Initially opposed Fixed Cap timing ("real market volume should precede redesign") | ||||||||||||||
| - Later reengaged positively, proposed coordinating with PoA migration | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ### James Bettauer (ecoToken) | ||||||||||||||
| - Warned that zeroing emissions could cause validator exodus | ||||||||||||||
| - Important perspective on cross-chain credit distribution validator competence | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ### Community Governance Audit ("inca", October 2025) | ||||||||||||||
| - 65% voting power concentration in top delegates | ||||||||||||||
| - 25% average voter turnout | ||||||||||||||
| - 30–35% proposal success rate | ||||||||||||||
| - Nakamoto Coefficient 18–22 (moderate decentralization) | ||||||||||||||
| - Geographic clustering in North America/Europe | ||||||||||||||
| - All findings directly support the case for PoA | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| --- | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Historical Validator Set Trajectory | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ``` | ||||||||||||||
| 2021: 50 validators at launch | ||||||||||||||
| ↓ (Proposal #3) | ||||||||||||||
| 2021: 75 validators (optimistic expansion) | ||||||||||||||
| ↓ (declining token price, validator economics) | ||||||||||||||
| 2024: RFC to reduce to 21 validators | ||||||||||||||
| ↓ (continued decline) | ||||||||||||||
| 2025-26: ~21 active (frequently dropping below), all operating at a loss | ||||||||||||||
| ↓ (PoA consensus emerging) | ||||||||||||||
| 2026+: 15–21 curated PoA authorities (proposed) | ||||||||||||||
| ``` | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| This trajectory illustrates the network's journey from PoS idealism to pragmatic mission-aligned governance. | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| --- | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Current Validator Reality (as of Jan 2026) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| - Maximum validator set: 75 | ||||||||||||||
| - Active validators: ~21 (sometimes dropping below) | ||||||||||||||
| - **All validators operate at a loss** — participation is mission-aligned, not economically rational | ||||||||||||||
| - Validator rewards insufficient to cover infrastructure costs | ||||||||||||||
| - Token price too low to make PoS security economically meaningful | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| --- | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## The Founding Vision | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| From the PoA Consensus RFC (Gregory_RND): | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| > "[Regen was originally conceived as] a consortium blockchain model where a group of trusted entities would run the chain until a valid Proof of Regeneration model could be created. Later on, the Regen Network project compromised with the prevailing [Cosmos PoS model]." | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| The PoA migration is framed not as centralization, but as a **return to the founding vision** — now with 5 years of operational experience and a mature community. | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| --- | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Related | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| - M014 spec: `phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md` | ||||||||||||||
| - Cosmos Labs x/poa: `docs/cosmos-poa-module.md` | ||||||||||||||
| - Bioregional validator framework: `docs/bioregional-validators.md` | ||||||||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+114
to
+116
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. To improve usability, the file paths in the "Related" section should be converted to clickable relative markdown links. This will allow readers to easily navigate to these documents. The link for the M014 spec can also be improved to point directly to the relevant section.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The Notion link appears to be broken as it seems to be missing the
/regennetwork/path segment. A similar link in another document includes this segment, which is common for shared Notion pages. Please correct the URL to ensure it's accessible.