Skip to content

docs: SDK v0.53 to v0.54 migration checklist for PoA#35

Open
glandua wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/sdk-v054-migration
Open

docs: SDK v0.53 to v0.54 migration checklist for PoA#35
glandua wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/sdk-v054-migration

Conversation

@glandua
Copy link
Contributor

@glandua glandua commented Mar 18, 2026

Summary

Adds docs/sdk-v054-migration.md — a concrete engineering checklist connecting M012-M015 mechanism specs to the actual Regen Ledger upgrade path.

  • Current stack versions (post v7.0: SDK v0.53.4, CometBFT v0.38.19, IBC-Go v10.4.0)
  • Target versions and expected release timeline (SDK v0.54 Q2 2026)
  • Pre-migration checklist: SDK, CometBFT, IBC-Go, CosmWasm assessments
  • x/poa integration steps: module registration, x/staking deprecation, governance integration, fee distribution
  • 3-phase migration sequence: SDK upgrade → consensus migration → economic integration
  • Risk assessment with severity/likelihood ratings
  • Safety mechanisms available (Circuit Breaker, governance, AGENT-004)
  • Engineering coordination plan (Cosmos Labs, Regen team, community validators)
  • Dependency map to other workstreams

Why This Matters

The mechanism specs tell us what to build. This document tells engineering how and when — with a concrete checklist, risk matrix, and dependency map. Without this, there's no bridge from specification to implementation.

Related

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a critical new documentation asset: a comprehensive migration checklist for upgrading Regen Ledger from Cosmos SDK v0.53 to v0.54, with a strong focus on integrating the native x/poa module. The document serves as a bridge between high-level mechanism specifications and the practical engineering steps, outlining technical assessments, integration procedures, a phased migration plan, risk management strategies, and coordination efforts. Its purpose is to provide a clear, actionable roadmap for the upcoming major network upgrade, ensuring all stakeholders understand the 'how' and 'when' of the implementation.

Highlights

  • New Migration Checklist Document: A new document, docs/sdk-v054-migration.md, was added to provide a concrete engineering checklist for the Regen Ledger upgrade from Cosmos SDK v0.53 to v0.54.
  • Comprehensive Upgrade Scope: The checklist details the upgrade path for Cosmos SDK (v0.53 to v0.54), CometBFT (v0.38 to v0.39), and IBC-Go (v10 to v11), including pre-migration assessments for each component and CosmWasm compatibility.
  • x/poa Module Integration: Specific steps are outlined for integrating the x/poa module, covering module registration, deprecation of x/staking, governance integration, and fee distribution mechanisms.
  • Phased Migration Sequence: A clear three-phase migration sequence is defined: SDK upgrade, consensus migration, and economic integration, providing a structured approach to the upgrade process.
  • Risk Assessment and Safety Mechanisms: The document includes a detailed risk assessment with severity and likelihood ratings, alongside available safety mechanisms such as the Circuit Breaker, governance, and IBC connection monitoring.
  • Engineering Coordination and Dependencies: Plans for engineering coordination with Cosmos Labs and the Regen team are detailed, along with a map of dependencies on other workstreams to ensure a smooth upgrade.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a comprehensive migration checklist for upgrading to Cosmos SDK v0.54 and integrating the x/poa module. The document is well-organized, covering key aspects from technical assessments to risk management. My review focused on the logical consistency of the plan and its alignment with the referenced mechanism specifications. I've highlighted a critical issue in the migration sequence where a module dependency is violated, which could prevent validator compensation, aligning with the rule on specifying transition logic between mechanisms. I also provided suggestions to improve the clarity and consistency of the dependency and reference sections, in line with the rule for improving document clarity. Addressing these points will strengthen this important planning document.

Comment on lines +86 to +110
## Migration Sequence

```
Phase A: SDK Upgrade (no consensus change)
1. Upgrade SDK v0.53 → v0.54
2. Upgrade CometBFT v0.38 → v0.39
3. Upgrade IBC-Go v10 → v11
4. Add x/poa module (inactive)
5. Test on regen-upgrade testnet
6. Governance proposal for mainnet upgrade

Phase B: Consensus Migration
1. Activate x/poa with seed validator set
2. Begin delegation wind-down period
3. Disable new x/staking delegations
4. Existing delegations unbond (21-day period)
5. Deactivate x/staking rewards
6. Monitor IBC channel health throughout

Phase C: Economic Integration
1. Deploy M013 fee routing (CosmWasm or native)
2. Configure fee → burn/validator/community splits
3. Activate M012 supply algorithm
4. Deploy M015 contribution tracking (later phase)
```
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The proposed Migration Sequence has a critical dependency flaw. Phase C plans to deploy M013 (fee routing) after Phase B activates x/poa (PoA/M014).

However, the mechanism specification (phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md, lines 467 and 719) states that M014 requires M013 for validator compensation. Activating PoA without the fee routing mechanism would leave validators uncompensated.

Please revise the migration sequence to ensure M013 is deployed and active before or concurrently with the PoA consensus migration in Phase B.

References
  1. When specifying transition logic between different mechanisms (e.g., multipliers), explicitly define the function (e.g., max()) and the state-based conditions (phase-gating) that govern the transition to prevent implementation ambiguity.

Comment on lines +150 to +151
| M013 fee routing spec finalized | Tokenomics WG | PR #23 open |
| M014 validator set defined | Tokenomics WG | PR #24 open |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This table lists the finalization of the M013 and M014 specs as separate dependencies, which can be confusing since they are part of the same specification document. To improve clarity, consider combining them into a single item that reflects their shared origin.

Suggested change
| M013 fee routing spec finalized | Tokenomics WG | PR #23 open |
| M014 validator set defined | Tokenomics WG | PR #24 open |
| M013 & M014 specs finalized | Tokenomics WG | PR #23 open |
References
  1. To improve document clarity, co-locate all state definitions and transitions within the primary state machine documentation, including definitions for edge-case flows like escalations.

Comment on lines +161 to +162
- M014 spec: `phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md`
- M013 spec: `phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The same specification file is listed twice for the M013 and M014 specs. Since this document's purpose is to connect specs M012–M015 to the engineering work, and all these specs are in the same file, it would be clearer and more concise to use a single, comprehensive reference to the mechanism specification document.

Suggested change
- M014 spec: `phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md`
- M013 spec: `phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md`
- Mechanism Specs (M012-M015): `phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md`
References
  1. To improve document clarity, co-locate all state definitions and transitions within the primary state machine documentation, including definitions for edge-case flows like escalations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant