Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for terrasos ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a significant enhancement to the platform's permission management, specifically targeting the 'Author' role. The core objective is to refine access control for data posts, ensuring that authors can only manage their own content and have restricted visibility into private or draft posts created by others. This change involves a comprehensive refactoring of permission-related logic across several components, moving towards a more explicit and secure role-based access model. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request refactors post and project access control by replacing a generic isAdmin flag with more specific permissions like canViewPrivatePost, canManagePost, canCreatePost, and canViewDraftPost, centralizing this logic into new utility functions based on user roles and account IDs. However, a high-severity broken access control vulnerability exists in Post.tsx where the canViewDraftPost logic is inverted, inadvertently allowing unauthorized users to view draft posts. Additionally, the getCanViewDraftPost utility function is a duplicate of getCanSeeOrManagePost and should be removed for better maintainability.
web-marketplace/src/components/templates/ProjectFormTemplate/ProjectFormAccessTemplate.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8aea233ff4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
|
@erikalogie @S4mmyb see testing instructions |
Description
Needs https://github.com/regen-network/regen-server/pull/564 before it can be tested
Part of https://regennetwork.atlassian.net/browse/APP-882
Authors should not be allowed to:
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
How to test
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...