Skip to content

Conversation

jmtd
Copy link
Member

@jmtd jmtd commented Mar 25, 2025

No description provided.

@jmtd jmtd requested review from jerboaa and sefroberg March 25, 2025 12:15
Copy link
Contributor

@jerboaa jerboaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't JDK 11 deprecated?

@sefroberg
Copy link

@jerboaa it is. @jmtd probably not needed.

Copy link

@sefroberg sefroberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't remember what we agreed for where to keep the version numbers for each image. If you want to keep the UBI 9 branch as the source of truth then this makes sense to update the jdk 11 images yamls. Otherwise I would leave that to the ELS branches.

@jmtd
Copy link
Member Author

jmtd commented Mar 25, 2025

Thanks @jerboaa @sefroberg for your catch; the ELS images should not rely on anything from this branch. I've removed bumping the version from the YAMLs and filed https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OPENJDK-3696 to track deleting the JDK11 image descriptors.

@jmtd jmtd merged commit 0f73dfe into rh-openjdk:ubi9 Mar 25, 2025
6 checks passed
@jmtd jmtd deleted the b1.22 branch March 25, 2025 13:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants