Skip to content

Conversation

jmtd
Copy link
Member

@jmtd jmtd commented Sep 3, 2025

(this requires #597 to be merged first)

remove a mechanism for providing JVM-specific diagnostics options which we do not need for modern JDKs.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OPENJDK-4030

@jmtd
Copy link
Member Author

jmtd commented Sep 3, 2025

observation: our new GHA action for label management isn't firing for PRs targetting ubi10.

@jmtd jmtd added the ubi10 RHEL UBI10 label Sep 3, 2025
This mechanism allows for different JVM diagnostic flags, but we
are using the same values for all supported JDK versions.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Dowland <[email protected]>
@jmtd jmtd force-pushed the OPENJDK-4030-rm-jvm-specific-diagnostics branch from f19deea to 4900388 Compare September 3, 2025 12:24
Copy link
Contributor

@jerboaa jerboaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK. What's up with GHA CI?

@jmtd
Copy link
Member Author

jmtd commented Sep 3, 2025

tests relating to script permissions are failing. There's a test in the ubi10 branch that's not in the ubi9 one that is superfluous now, I think; I'm going to do a catch-up merge of ubi9's recent changes into ubi10 and then make sure they're all ok. Sorry I didn't catch that test issue before I pushed.

@jmtd jmtd merged commit b674696 into rh-openjdk:ubi10 Sep 4, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@jmtd jmtd deleted the OPENJDK-4030-rm-jvm-specific-diagnostics branch September 4, 2025 07:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ubi10 RHEL UBI10
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants