Skip to content

CI: Update from f39/f40/f41 to f42/f43/f44#792

Merged
vathpela merged 5 commits intorhboot:mainfrom
vathpela:update-ci-f44
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

CI: Update from f39/f40/f41 to f42/f43/f44#792
vathpela merged 5 commits intorhboot:mainfrom
vathpela:update-ci-f44

Conversation

@vathpela
Copy link
Member

Fedora 41 is pretty old, so update to some supported (or nearly supported) OSes.

@vathpela vathpela force-pushed the update-ci-f44 branch 2 times, most recently from d0cffb7 to 61aa013 Compare March 19, 2026 21:14
Fedora 41 is pretty old, so update to some supported (or nearly
supported) OSes.

Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
This adds centos10 to CI.

Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
@vathpela vathpela force-pushed the update-ci-f44 branch 2 times, most recently from 6bd9cf9 to 88e3123 Compare March 19, 2026 21:26
@vathpela vathpela changed the title Update from f39/f40/f41 to f42/f43/f44 CI: Update from f39/f40/f41 to f42/f43/f44 Mar 19, 2026
Apparently strrchr() became a macro in glibc recently, breaking our test
case that tries to #define it.

This patch undefines it before we try to define it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Without this when e.g. f44 fails we don't necessarily know if f43 or f45
worked.

Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
@vathpela vathpela force-pushed the update-ci-f44 branch 4 times, most recently from e4a0340 to ebb295c Compare March 20, 2026 14:27
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
@vathpela
Copy link
Member Author

This makes CI work again for other posts, so I'm gonna push it.

@vathpela vathpela merged commit 8314c39 into rhboot:main Mar 20, 2026
56 checks passed
@vathpela vathpela deleted the update-ci-f44 branch March 20, 2026 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant