Alphabetized the prefix and extensions lists by vendor name

[apazos]

No description provided.

[apazos]

@cmuellner, just noted we missed to alphabetize the lists in the approved PR #69

[cmuellner]

Thanks for catching this!

There are two tables:

• vendor, prefix, link -> sorted by prefix
• vendor, extension, link -> sorted by vendor

The sort order seems arbitrary.
It would be better to sort both by vendor or by prefix/extension.

Also, since the focus is on the prefix/extension, we could swap the first two columns of the table.

[apazos]

I think that ordering vendor extensions by name makes the table less readable due to its length.
Might be best to just order both by vendor.

[cmuellner]

I think that ordering vendor extensions by name makes the table less readable due to its length. Might be best to just order both by vendor.

I can see pros/cons for both orderings.
If needed, a Ctrl + F will help to find entries.

Thank you for ordering both tables the same way!