Skip to content

Updated InterruptsU.S based on the feedback received and cleaned it up#840

Draft
SadhviNarayanan wants to merge 3 commits intoriscv:act4from
SadhviNarayanan:interruptsU
Draft

Updated InterruptsU.S based on the feedback received and cleaned it up#840
SadhviNarayanan wants to merge 3 commits intoriscv:act4from
SadhviNarayanan:interruptsU

Conversation

@SadhviNarayanan
Copy link
Contributor

Updated InterruptsU.S based on the feedback received and made the tests more consistent with each other.

@davidharrishmc
Copy link
Collaborator

Let's not push your Makefile because other people will want to be compiling different groups of tests. Just keep your change local for that.

Is InterruptsU running and getting 100% coverage? How is InterruptsM? I'd suggest getting InterruptsM hitting coverage first in its loop form, then writing a generator for testgen to automatically produce it (see the Sm generator in testgen), getting it up to 100% coverage, then moving on to do the same for InterruptsU.

@jordancarlin jordancarlin added the ACT4 Issues or PRs applicable to ACT4 label Feb 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ACT4 Issues or PRs applicable to ACT4

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants