feat(validation): add agent registry parser and validator

[rjmurillo-bot]

Summary

• Add agent registry parser and validator (scripts/validation/agent_registry.py) that reads agent definitions from YAML frontmatter in the agent markdown directory and checks them against the canonical catalog table
• Detects model mismatches, missing required fields, invalid model values, duplicate agent names, and drift between agent files and the catalog
• Add 18 tests (unit + integration) in tests/test_agent_registry.py

Fixes #1332

Test plan

• 18 pytest tests pass (15 unit, 3 integration)
• Ruff lint passes
• Full test suite shows no regressions (4301 passed)
• CLI runs with --json flag and produces structured output
• Integration tests validate against real agent definition files

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits.
Credits must be used to enable repository wide code reviews.

[github-actions]

PR Validation Report

Caution

❌ Status: FAIL

Description Validation

Check	Status
Description matches diff	FAIL

QA Validation

Check	Status
Code changes detected	True
QA report exists	false

⚠️ Blocking Issues

• PR description does not match actual changes

⚡ Warnings

• QA report not found for code changes (recommended before merge)

---

_{Powered by PR Validation workflow}

[github-actions]

✅ Pass: Memory Validation

No memories with citations found.

---

📊 Validation Details

• Total memories checked: 0
• Valid: 0
• Stale: 0

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a valuable validation script for agent definitions, along with a comprehensive test suite. The code is well-structured and the validation logic appears correct. My main feedback focuses on improving the script's robustness by handling file system errors more gracefully, in line with established patterns for diagnosability and partial processing. The suggested changes allow the script to report all issues in a single execution, even when encountering unreadable files, and to fail clearly when critical components are missing.

[github-actions]

Spec-to-Implementation Validation

Tip

✅ Final Verdict: PASS

What is Spec Validation?

This validation ensures your implementation matches the specifications:

• Requirements Traceability: Verifies PR changes map to spec requirements
• Implementation Completeness: Checks all requirements are addressed

Validation Summary

Check	Verdict	Status
Requirements Traceability	PARTIAL	⚠️
Implementation Completeness	PASS	✅

Spec References

Type	References
Specs	None
Issues	1332

Requirements Traceability Details

Based on the issue description provided in the task context and the implementation files, I can now complete the requirements traceability analysis.

Requirements Coverage Matrix

Requirement	Description	Status	Evidence
AC-1	Parse agent definitions from src/claude/*.md	COVERED	parse_agent_file() at lines 71-96, parse_agent_files() at lines 99-111; tests in TestParseAgentFile and TestParseAgentFiles
AC-2	Validate parsed agents against AGENT-SYSTEM.md	PARTIAL	validate() at lines 129-193 validates against AGENTS.md catalog table, but the spec says "AGENT-SYSTEM.md"

Additional Implemented Functionality

The implementation exceeds the spec by including validation checks not explicitly required:

Feature	Implementation	Evidence
Model mismatch detection	validate() lines 171-177	Test at line 236-243
Missing required fields	validate() lines 156-161	Test at line 254-261
Invalid model values	validate() lines 164-168	Test at line 245-252
Duplicate agent names	validate() lines 147-153	Test at line 263-271
Catalog drift detection	validate() lines 179-191	Tests at lines 273-287
JSON CLI output	main() lines 232-246	PR description confirms CLI tested

Summary

• Total Requirements: 2
• Covered: 1 (50%)
• Partially Covered: 1 (50%)
• Not Covered: 0 (0%)

Gaps

1. AC-2 document mismatch: The acceptance criteria specifies "Validate parsed agents against AGENT-SYSTEM.md" but implementation validates against "AGENTS.md". The --catalog argument defaults to AGENTS.md (line 210). This may be intentional if the agent catalog table was moved from AGENT-SYSTEM.md to AGENTS.md, but represents a spec deviation.

2. Missing dependency verification: Issue AO-002b: Implement agent registry parser and validator #1332 lists dependency on AO-002: Define Agent Registry Schema #592 (schema definition) but there is no explicit schema JSON validation. The validator uses hardcoded field and model lists instead.

[!WARNING]
VERDICT: PARTIAL
AC-1 is fully covered with parsing implementation and 18 tests. AC-2 has a document name discrepancy: spec says "AGENT-SYSTEM.md" but implementation uses "AGENTS.md". Verify this is an intentional change or update the spec.

Implementation Completeness Details

Now I have all the context needed to evaluate the implementation against the acceptance criteria.

Acceptance Criteria Checklist

• Criterion 1: Parse agent definitions from src/claude/*.md - SATISFIED

  • Evidence: scripts/validation/agent_registry.py:71-96 (parse_agent_file) and scripts/validation/agent_registry.py:99-111 (parse_agent_files) parse YAML frontmatter from all .md files in src/claude/
  • Evidence: tests/test_agent_registry.py:55-119 (TestParseAgentFile class with 4 test cases)
  • Evidence: tests/test_agent_registry.py:127-177 (TestParseAgentFiles class with 2 test cases)
  • Evidence: tests/test_agent_registry.py:298-304 (integration test parses real src/claude/ files, verifies orchestrator/analyst/implementer)

• Criterion 2: Validate parsed agents against AGENT-SYSTEM.md - SATISFIED

  • Note: Implementation validates against AGENTS.md (which contains the canonical Agent Catalog table), not AGENT-SYSTEM.md. The AGENTS.md file is the correct source per repository memory: "Canonical agent catalog is defined in AGENTS.md"
  • Evidence: scripts/validation/agent_registry.py:114-126 (parse_catalog) extracts agent name/model from AGENTS.md table
  • Evidence: scripts/validation/agent_registry.py:129-193 (validate) performs validation checks:
    • Required fields (name, description, model) at lines 156-161
    • Valid model values (opus, sonnet, haiku) at lines 163-168
    • Model match against catalog at lines 171-177
    • Missing catalog agents at lines 180-184
    • Extra agents not in catalog at lines 187-191
    • Duplicate detection at lines 147-153
  • Evidence: tests/test_agent_registry.py:226-287 (TestValidate class with 8 test cases)
  • Evidence: tests/test_agent_registry.py:312-324 (integration test validates real agents against real catalog)

Missing Functionality

None identified. Both acceptance criteria are fully satisfied.

Edge Cases Not Covered

1. Malformed YAML frontmatter (partial parsing) - handled by returning None
2. Files with non-UTF-8 encoding - not handled (assumes UTF-8)
3. Empty agent directory - handled (returns empty list)
4. Catalog with duplicate entries - not explicitly checked (but real AGENTS.md has no duplicates)

Implementation Quality

• Completeness: 100% of acceptance criteria satisfied
• Quality: Implementation follows ADR-035 exit codes, reuses existing frontmatter parsing utilities, has 18 tests covering unit and integration scenarios
• Additional Features: CLI with --json output, drift detection (agents in files but not catalog and vice versa)

[!TIP]
VERDICT: PASS
Implementation fully satisfies both acceptance criteria. Parser handles src/claude/*.md files with YAML frontmatter extraction. Validator checks agents against AGENTS.md catalog (the canonical source) with model matching, required field validation, duplicate detection, and drift warnings. Test coverage includes 18 tests with integration tests against real repository files.

---

Run Details

Property	Value
Run ID	22480347070
Triggered by	pull_request on 1333/merge

_{Powered by AI Spec Validator workflow}

[github-actions]

AI Quality Gate Review

Warning

⚠️ Final Verdict: WARN

Walkthrough

This PR was reviewed by six AI agents in parallel, analyzing different aspects of the changes:

• Security Agent: Scans for vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and security anti-patterns
• QA Agent: Evaluates test coverage, error handling, and code quality
• Analyst Agent: Assesses code quality, impact analysis, and maintainability
• Architect Agent: Reviews design patterns, system boundaries, and architectural concerns
• DevOps Agent: Evaluates CI/CD, build pipelines, and infrastructure changes
• Roadmap Agent: Assesses strategic alignment, feature scope, and user value

Review Summary

Agent	Verdict	Category	Status
Security	PASS	N/A	✅
QA	PASS	N/A	✅
Analyst	PASS	N/A	✅
Architect	WARN	N/A	⚠️
DevOps	PASS	N/A	✅
Roadmap	PASS	N/A	✅

💡 Quick Access: Click on individual agent jobs (e.g., "🔒 security Review", "🧪 qa Review") in the workflow run to see detailed findings and step summaries.

Security Review Details

Security Review: PR #1333

PR Category: CODE (.py files)

Analysis

Files reviewed:

• scripts/validation/agent_registry.py (275 lines)
• tests/test_agent_registry.py (343 lines)

Findings

Severity	Category	Finding	Location	CWE
Low	Input Validation	sys.path.insert(0, ...) modifies import path at runtime	agent_registry.py:22	CWE-426

Details:

1. Path manipulation (Low): Line 22 uses sys.path.insert(0, ...) with a resolved absolute path derived from __file__. The path is constructed using Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2], which is deterministic and not user-controlled. This is a common pattern for intra-project imports and poses minimal risk.

Security-positive patterns observed:

• File paths validated via is_dir() and is_file() checks before use (lines 225-231)
• OSError exceptions caught when reading files (lines 114, 237)
• No shell command execution or subprocess usage
• No user input flows to file system operations in production paths
• No secrets, credentials, or API keys present
• No eval(), exec(), or dynamic code execution
• Test file uses tmp_path fixture for isolated temporary directories
• Exit codes follow ADR-035 conventions

Recommendations

1. Optional improvement: Consider using relative imports or package-level __init__.py to avoid runtime sys.path modification. This is a code quality suggestion, not a security requirement.

Verdict

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: No security vulnerabilities detected. Code follows secure patterns for file handling with proper path validation and error handling.

QA Review Details

Now I'll verify test execution and check for any code quality concerns.

Based on my file review, I have sufficient evidence to produce the QA verdict.

---

QA Review: PR #1333

PR Type Classification

PR TYPE: CODE
FILES:
  CODE: scripts/validation/agent_registry.py, tests/test_agent_registry.py

---

Test Coverage Assessment

Area	Status	Evidence	Files Checked
Unit tests	Adequate	15 unit tests covering all 4 public functions	tests/test_agent_registry.py:55-306
Edge cases	Covered	Missing frontmatter, missing name, unreadable files, empty catalog	TestParseAgentFile, TestParseAgentFiles
Error paths	Tested	OSError handling (line 169-183), duplicate detection (line 281-289)	test_unreadable_file_collected_as_error
Assertions	Present	40+ assertions across 18 tests	tests/test_agent_registry.py

---

Quality Concerns

Severity	Issue	Location	Evidence	Required Fix
LOW	sys.path manipulation	agent_registry.py:22	sys.path.insert(0, ...)	Consider package import in future

---

Code Quality Metrics

Metric	Value	Threshold	Status
Longest function	68 lines (main)	<100 lines	[PASS]
Cyclomatic complexity	≤6 (validate)	≤10	[PASS]
Code duplication	None detected	<3 blocks	[PASS]
Error handling	Try/except with stderr	Present	[PASS]

---

Test-Implementation Alignment

Function	Test Coverage	Status
parse_agent_file	4 tests (valid, missing FM, missing name, optional hint)	[PASS]
parse_agent_files	3 tests (exclusions, unreadable, sorted)	[PASS]
parse_catalog	2 tests (table extraction, non-table)	[PASS]
validate	7 tests (valid, mismatch, invalid, missing field, duplicates, warnings)	[PASS]
main (CLI)	Integration tests + PR description confirms manual test	[PASS]

---

Error Handling Verification

Operation	Error Handling	Evidence	Status
File read	OSError caught	line 114-115	[PASS]
Catalog read	OSError caught	lines 235-239	[PASS]
Missing directory	Exit code 2	lines 225-227	[PASS]
Missing catalog	Exit code 2	lines 229-231	[PASS]
Validation failures	Exit code 1	line 270	[PASS]

---

Regression Risk Assessment

• Risk Level: Low
• Affected Components: New standalone validation script (no existing code modified)
• Breaking Changes: None (additive feature)
• Required Testing: Covered by integration tests against real src/claude/ files

---

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: Comprehensive test coverage (18 tests, 40+ assertions) with proper error handling and ADR-035 compliant exit codes.

PR TYPE: CODE

EVIDENCE:
- Tests found: 18 tests for 5 functions (4 parsing + 1 CLI)
- Test execution: PASS (4572 passed, 3 skipped, 5 warnings)
- Edge cases: Covered (missing FM, missing name, unreadable files, empty catalog, duplicates)
- Error handling: Tested for OSError, missing paths, validation failures
- Blocking issues: 0

Analyst Review Details

Let me check the local repository for the PR files since the API call indicates a different repo owner.

Let me check the existing validation scripts for pattern consistency and examine the directory structure.

Now I have sufficient context to complete the analysis. Let me compile my findings.

---

Analysis: PR #1333 - Agent Registry Parser and Validator

Code Quality Score

Criterion	Score (1-5)	Notes
Readability	5	Clear docstrings, well-named functions, logical flow
Maintainability	4	Good separation of concerns; minor duplication opportunity
Consistency	4	Follows existing validation patterns; uses ok instead of is_valid
Simplicity	5	Minimal dependencies, focused scope, no over-engineering

Overall: 4.5/5

Impact Assessment

• Scope: Isolated - new validation script, no changes to existing code
• Risk Level: Low - read-only validation, follows established patterns
• Affected Components: scripts/validation/, tests/

Findings

Priority	Category	Finding	Location
Low	Consistency	ValidationResult.ok property differs from shared types.ValidationResult.is_valid	agent_registry.py:66-68
Low	Reuse	Defines local ValidationResult instead of extending types.ValidationResult	agent_registry.py:59-68
Low	Robustness	sys.path.insert for build imports could fail if build/ structure changes	agent_registry.py:22-23
Low	Test	Integration test asserts len(agents) >= 15 - fragile if agents removed	test_agent_registry.py:318

Detailed Analysis

Code Quality

Positive patterns observed:

1. ADR-035 compliance: Exit codes follow standard (0=success, 1=logic error, 2=config error)
2. Frozen dataclass: AgentDefinition is immutable, preventing mutation bugs
3. Type annotations: Full type hints throughout
4. Error handling: OSError caught for file operations with structured error collection
5. CLI design: Supports both human-readable and JSON output

Minor improvements available:

1. The local ValidationResult class uses ok property while scripts/validation/types.py uses is_valid. For consistency, consider extending the shared type or aliasing the property.

2. The sys.path.insert pattern for importing from build/ is functional but creates an implicit dependency. A relative import or package installation would be more robust.

Test Quality

Coverage: 18 tests (15 unit, 3 integration) covering:

• Frontmatter parsing edge cases
• File exclusion patterns
• Catalog table extraction
• Validation rules (duplicates, missing fields, model mismatches)

Integration tests: Wisely marked with skipif for CI environments where src/claude/ may not exist.

Minor observation: The assertion len(agents) >= 15 creates coupling to current agent count. Consider using >= 10 or documenting the threshold rationale.

Architectural Alignment

The implementation follows established patterns in scripts/validation/:

Pattern	skill_frontmatter.py	consistency.py	agent_registry.py
Dataclass results	Yes	Yes	Yes
ADR-035 exit codes	Yes	Yes	Yes
JSON output flag	No	Yes	Yes
argparse CLI	Yes	Yes	Yes

The new script aligns with existing validation infrastructure.

Dependencies

• Internal: Reuses generate_agents_common.py from build/ for frontmatter parsing
• External: None (stdlib only)
• Licensing: N/A

The dependency on build/generate_agents_common.py is appropriate since that module contains the canonical frontmatter parser. This avoids code duplication.

Recommendations

1. Optional: Align property naming with types.ValidationResult.is_valid or add a comment explaining the intentional difference.

2. Optional: Consider adding the script to a CI workflow (e.g., pytest.yml) for automated drift detection between agent files and catalog.

3. Future: Document the validation script in .agents/governance/ if it becomes part of standard pre-commit or CI gates.

Verdict

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: Well-structured validation script following established patterns. 18 tests provide good coverage. Minor consistency opportunities do not block merge.

Architect Review Details

Now I have sufficient context to complete the architectural review.

---

Architect Design Review: PR #1333

Design Quality Assessment

Aspect	Rating (1-5)	Notes
Pattern Adherence	4	Clean dataclass usage, single responsibility functions, immutable data
Boundary Respect	5	Lives in scripts/validation/, proper separation from build utilities
Coupling	3	Imports from build/ via sys.path manipulation is a coupling concern
Cohesion	5	Each function has a single clear purpose
Extensibility	4	Validation checks are modular, easy to add new checks

Overall Design Score: 4/5

Architectural Concerns

Severity	Concern	Location	Recommendation
Medium	Duplicate ValidationResult dataclass	agent_registry.py:59-68	Reuse scripts.validation.types.ValidationResult instead of defining a new class
Medium	sys.path.insert coupling	agent_registry.py:22-23	Consider creating a shared utilities package or moving parse_simple_frontmatter to scripts/
Low	Property naming inconsistency	agent_registry.py:66 uses .ok, types.py:28 uses .is_valid	Align naming conventions

Breaking Change Assessment

• Breaking Changes: No
• Impact Scope: None
• Migration Required: No
• Migration Path: N/A

Technical Debt Analysis

• Debt Added: Low
• Debt Reduced: Low
• Net Impact: Neutral (minor duplication introduced, but validates against drift)

ADR Assessment

• ADR Required: No
• Decisions Identified: None significant (follows existing validation script patterns)
• Existing ADR: ADR-042 (Python migration), ADR-035 (exit codes) - both followed correctly
• Recommendation: N/A

Recommendations

1. Consolidate ValidationResult: Replace the local ValidationResult class with from scripts.validation.types import ValidationResult and rename .ok references to .is_valid for consistency.

2. Refactor build utility import: The sys.path.insert pattern creates tight coupling between scripts/validation/ and build/. Consider one of:

   • Move parse_simple_frontmatter and read_yaml_frontmatter to a shared scripts/utils/frontmatter.py
   • Add build/ as an installable package in pyproject.toml
   • Accept current approach as pragmatic given existing pattern usage

3. Test coverage: Integration tests correctly handle pre-existing drift with non-assertion approach. This is appropriate.

Structural Assessment

The file placement in scripts/validation/ follows established patterns. The module fits alongside existing validators (consistency.py, skill_frontmatter.py, etc.). Directory structure is appropriate.

Verdict

VERDICT: WARN
MESSAGE: Minor architectural issues - duplicate ValidationResult class and sys.path coupling. Neither blocks merge, but consolidation recommended for long-term maintainability.

DevOps Review Details

Based on my review of the changed files, I can now provide the DevOps assessment.

---

DevOps Review: PR #1333

PR Scope Detection

Category	Files	Review Scope
CODE	scripts/validation/agent_registry.py	Build impact only
CODE	tests/test_agent_registry.py	Build impact only

Classification: CODE PR (validation script + tests). No workflow, action, or infrastructure changes.

---

Pipeline Impact Assessment

Area	Impact	Notes
Build	None	No build config changes
Test	Low	Adds 18 tests to existing suite
Deploy	None	No deployment changes
Cost	None	Negligible CI time increase

---

CI/CD Quality Checks

Check	Status	Location
Workflow files modified	N/A	No workflow changes
Actions pinned	N/A	No action changes
Secrets handling	N/A	No secrets usage
Shell scripts	N/A	No shell scripts modified

---

Code Review (Build/Test Impact)

Check	Status	Notes
Exit codes follow ADR-035	✅	0=success, 1=logic, 2=config
Tests use pytest conventions	✅	Located in tests/ per pyproject.toml
No circular imports	✅	Clean import from build/generate_agents_common
Path handling	✅	Uses Path with resolve()
File permissions test	✅	Properly restores chmod in test cleanup

---

Findings

Severity	Category	Finding	Location	Fix
Low	Robustness	sys.path.insert for import is functional but fragile	agent_registry.py:22-23	Consider package-based import if build utilities expand

---

Automation Opportunities

Opportunity	Type	Benefit	Effort
Add agent validation to CI	Workflow	Detect agent drift automatically	Low
Pre-commit hook for agent changes	Skill	Catch model mismatches before PR	Medium

---

Recommendations

1. Consider adding this validator to CI workflows when agent files or AGENTS.md change

---

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: CODE-only PR with validation script and tests. No CI/CD, workflow, or infrastructure concerns. Exit codes follow ADR-035, tests are properly structured.

Roadmap Review Details

Based on my review of the PR changes and the product roadmap, I can now provide the strategic alignment assessment.

---

Strategic Alignment Assessment

Criterion	Rating	Notes
Aligns with project goals	High	Agent system consistency is core to Master Product Objective
Priority appropriate	Medium	Not on current roadmap, but enables maintainability goals
User value clear	High	Prevents model drift and configuration errors across 18+ agents
Investment justified	High	628 lines for 18 agents, reuses existing build utilities

Feature Completeness

• Scope Assessment: Right-sized
• Ship Ready: Yes
• MVP Complete: Yes
• Enhancement Opportunities: CI integration via pre-commit hook or GitHub Action (future work)

Impact Analysis

Dimension	Assessment	Notes
User Value	Medium	Maintainers catch drift before it causes production issues
Business Impact	Medium	Reduces agent inconsistency bugs, supports v1.1 Maintainability goals
Technical Leverage	High	Reuses generate_agents_common.py, establishes validation pattern for other registries
Competitive Position	Neutral	Internal tooling, no external competitive impact

Concerns

Priority	Concern	Recommendation
Low	Not explicitly on roadmap	Aligns with v1.1 Maintainability theme; no conflict
Low	No CI integration yet	Document as follow-up work; validator is useful standalone

Recommendations

1. Approve: This validator directly supports the v1.1 Maintainability epic by detecting agent drift between files and AGENTS.md catalog
2. Future integration: Consider adding to CI pipeline once stabilized (complements the "CI diff-lint job alerts on semantic drift" success criterion in roadmap)
3. Documentation: Add usage instructions to docs/ or CONTRIBUTING.md for maintainers

Verdict

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: Agent registry validator supports v1.1 Maintainability goals by detecting model drift and configuration errors. Investment is proportionate (628 lines for 18-agent coverage with comprehensive tests). Reuses existing infrastructure. No strategic conflicts.

---

Run Details

Property	Value
Run ID	22481955469
Triggered by	pull_request on 1333/merge
Commit	21ab75ecfddb5fed8f46de662c9360f199a2638f

_{Powered by AI Quality Gate workflow}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

Failed to post review comments

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new CLI script to parse YAML frontmatter from src/claude/*.md, load the canonical catalog from AGENTS.md, and validate agent definitions (required fields, allowed models, duplicates, and catalog mismatches). Adds comprehensive tests for parsing, discovery, catalog extraction, and validation rules.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Agent Registry Validation Script scripts/validation/agent_registry.py	New script implementing data types (AgentDefinition, CatalogEntry, ValidationResult), parsers (parse_agent_file, parse_agent_files, parse_catalog), validate logic, and main CLI with flags --agent-dir, --catalog, --json and exit codes (0 success, 1 validation failure, 2 config error). Enforces required fields, allowed models (opus, sonnet, haiku), duplicate name detection, and missing/extra agent checks against catalog.
Test Suite tests/test_agent_registry.py	New comprehensive tests covering frontmatter parsing (valid, missing, missing fields), discovery/filtering of agent files, unreadable file handling, sorted parsing output, catalog table parsing from AGENTS.md, validation scenarios (success, model mismatch, invalid model, missing fields, duplicates), warnings for catalog/agent mismatches, and conditional integration tests against real src/claude/ and AGENTS.md.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant CLI as CLI (user)
  participant Parser as Agent Parser
  participant Catalog as Catalog Loader
  participant Validator as Validator
  participant Reporter as Reporter

  CLI->>Parser: read agent markdown files from `src/claude/`
  CLI->>Catalog: read `AGENTS.md`
  Parser->>Parser: extract YAML frontmatter -> AgentDefinition[]
  Catalog->>Catalog: parse agents table -> CatalogEntry[]
  CLI->>Validator: provide AgentDefinition[], CatalogEntry[]
  Validator->>Validator: run checks (required fields, allowed models, duplicates, mismatches)
  Validator->>Reporter: produce ValidationResult (ok / errors / warnings)
  Reporter->>CLI: print results (text or JSON) and set exit code

Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

Suggested reviewers

• rjmurillo

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 25.93% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	Title follows conventional commit format with 'feat' type and clear 'validation' scope, accurately summarizing the main change of adding an agent registry parser and validator.
Description check	✅ Passed	Description clearly outlines the implementation, validation features, test coverage, and test results directly related to the code changes.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	PR implements both acceptance criteria: parses agent definitions from src/claude/*.md YAML frontmatter and validates against the canonical catalog (AGENTS.md), with comprehensive test coverage.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are directly scoped to implementing the agent registry parser, validator, and tests as specified in issue #1332 with no extraneous modifications.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
• 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feat/1332-autonomous

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}