Refine Copilot and CONTRIBUTING guidelines for clarity and conciseness#2150
Refine Copilot and CONTRIBUTING guidelines for clarity and conciseness#2150
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2150 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 73% 73%
=======================================
Files 61 61
Lines 7386 7386
=======================================
Hits 5413 5413
Misses 1973 1973 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request refines the project's contributor and reviewer documentation by consolidating and clarifying guidelines across two key files. The changes transform copilot-instructions.md from a verbose PR review guideline document into a concise, context-aware reference guide for development workflows, while moving the comprehensive PR review guidelines to CONTRIBUTING.md where they're more discoverable for human contributors and reviewers.
Changes:
- Rewrote
.github/copilot-instructions.mdto provide concise repository overview, project structure, development commands, code conventions, and cross-references to detailed documentation - Added comprehensive "PR Review Guidelines" section to
.github/CONTRIBUTING.mdwith objectives, checklists, scoring rubrics, risk assessment frameworks, and review templates - Established consistent cross-references between documentation files to guide users to appropriate resources
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
.github/copilot-instructions.md |
Completely restructured from detailed PR review guidelines to concise development context guide with commands, conventions, and cross-references |
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md |
Added comprehensive PR Review Guidelines section (289 lines) covering review objectives, completeness checklists, quality assessment rubrics, risk assessment, and best practices |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…mproved clarity and usability.
This pull request introduces significant improvements to the project's contributor and reviewer documentation. The main focus is on providing clear, actionable, and consistent guidelines for both code contributors and reviewers. The changes include a comprehensive new PR Review Guidelines section in
CONTRIBUTING.mdand a rewritten, more focusedcopilot-instructions.mdthat covers repository context, development workflows, code conventions, and review best practices.The most important changes are:
PR Review Process Enhancements:
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md, outlining objectives, checklists, scoring rubrics, risk assessment, constructive feedback strategies, and a standardized review summary template to ensure actionable and high-quality reviews.Developer and Maintainer Onboarding:
.github/copilot-instructions.mdto provide a concise repository overview, project structure, and explicit instructions for setup, development, testing, documentation, and review processes, making onboarding easier for new contributors and maintainers.Code Quality and Contribution Standards:
Testing and Documentation Requirements:
Branching and Commit Strategy: