flatten benchmark results in docs/ to a single menu item

[aantn]

Motivation is simplifying the menu hierarchy - flatter is simpler and easier to browse and we don't really have justification for something more complex here

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The documentation structure for evaluation history is reorganized from a hierarchical layout with weekly/ and special/ subdirectories into a flat history directory. Navigation configuration is updated to use wildcards instead of explicit entries, and the benchmark script paths are adjusted to reflect the new structure.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Parent navigation and documentation docs/development/evaluations/history/.nav.yml	Added sort: direction: desc and replaced explicit "Weekly" and "Special" entries with wildcard * for dynamic content inclusion
	docs/development/evaluations/history/index.md
Removed subdirectory configurations docs/development/evaluations/history/weekly/.nav.yml, docs/development/evaluations/history/special/.nav.yml	Deleted navigation configuration files (sort directives and nav lists) for both subdirectories
Removed subdirectory documentation docs/development/evaluations/history/weekly/index.md, docs/development/evaluations/history/special/index.md	Deleted documentation pages defining "Weekly Benchmark Runs" and "Special Benchmark Runs" sections with their descriptions and "Available Results" subsections
Benchmark script update run_benchmarks_local.sh	Changed historical artifact paths from docs/development/evaluations/history/weekly/results_${TIMESTAMP}.md to docs/development/evaluations/history/results_${TIMESTAMP}.md (flattened directory structure)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

• The changes are primarily structural and organizational, involving consistent path refactoring across a small set of files
• Verify that all path references in the benchmark script are correctly updated to match the new flat history directory structure
• Confirm navigation wildcard syntax is compatible with the documentation system

Possibly related PRs

• Add benchmarks for Claude 4.5 #1017: Adds timestamped historical results generation with wildcard history navigation, directly related to the new artifact storage approach
• Organize benchmarks into weekly and special runs #1056: Makes conflicting changes to the same evaluation history navigation and benchmark script files, with an opposite restructuring approach
• Make benchmarks more prominent in docs #1030: Modifies the documentation structure for development/evaluations and benchmark artifacts with potential overlapping scope

Suggested reviewers

• Sheeproid

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title "flatten benchmark results in docs/ to a single menu item" accurately describes the main change in the changeset. The PR consolidates the benchmark results documentation from a hierarchical structure with separate "Weekly" and "Special" sections into a flat menu using wildcard navigation, removes the dedicated subdirectory pages, and updates the main history index to reflect these organizational changes. The title is concise, clear, and specific enough that a teammate reviewing history would understand the primary change.
Description Check	✅ Passed	The description "Motivation is simplifying the menu hierarchy - flatter is simpler and easier to browse and we don't really have justification for something more complex here" is directly related to the changeset. It explains the reasoning behind flattening the benchmark results structure, which aligns with the actual changes made: removing the separate weekly and special benchmark subdirectories and consolidating them into a single flat history directory. The description provides clear context for the organizational restructuring even if brief.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch flatten-benchmark-results

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d07e99 and 5018c2a.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)

• docs/development/evaluations/history/.nav.yml (1 hunks)
• docs/development/evaluations/history/index.md (1 hunks)
• docs/development/evaluations/history/special/.nav.yml (0 hunks)
• docs/development/evaluations/history/special/index.md (0 hunks)
• docs/development/evaluations/history/weekly/.nav.yml (0 hunks)
• docs/development/evaluations/history/weekly/index.md (0 hunks)
• run_benchmarks_local.sh (1 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)

• docs/development/evaluations/history/weekly/index.md
• docs/development/evaluations/history/special/.nav.yml
• docs/development/evaluations/history/special/index.md
• docs/development/evaluations/history/weekly/.nav.yml

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

In MkDocs content, always add a blank line between a header or bold text and a following list so lists render correctly

Files:

• docs/development/evaluations/history/index.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)

• GitHub Check: llm_evals
• GitHub Check: Pre-commit checks
• GitHub Check: build

🔇 Additional comments (4)

docs/development/evaluations/history/.nav.yml (2)

1-2: Sort direction appropriate for historical results.

Setting direction: desc to show newest results first is the right choice for a historical evaluation archive.

---

1-5: ****

The .nav.yml configuration using "*" is correct. The project uses mkdocs-awesome-nav plugin, which adds glob/wildcard pattern support for navigation. The wildcard pattern will function as expected.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

docs/development/evaluations/history/index.md (1)

1-9: Clarify how Weekly Results and Extended Comparisons are distinguished in the flat directory structure.

The index describes two conceptual categories ("Weekly Results" and "Extended Comparisons"), but with files now in a flat history/ directory, it's unclear how these categories are separated. Consider whether filename conventions, tags, or metadata differentiate them, or whether these section headers should be reformulated to better match the flattened structure.

Are there filename patterns or metadata fields that distinguish Weekly from Extended results? Please provide context on how this distinction is maintained in the flat structure.

run_benchmarks_local.sh (1)

157-165: Manual verification needed to confirm path change is fully isolated.

The search found no references to the old docs/development/evaluations/history/weekly/ path in the codebase. However, since absence of search results doesn't guarantee completeness, please manually verify:

• Any CI/CD workflows or GitHub Actions that might reference the old benchmark path
• External documentation or README files outside the main docs directory
• Configuration files that might reference evaluation output locations

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

Results of HolmesGPT evals

• ask_holmes: 33/35 test cases were successful, 0 regressions, 1 setup failures

Test suite	Test case	Status
ask	01_how_many_pods	✅
ask	02_what_is_wrong_with_pod	✅
ask	04_related_k8s_events	✅
ask	05_image_version	✅
ask	09_crashpod	✅
ask	10_image_pull_backoff	✅
ask	110_k8s_events_image_pull	✅
ask	11_init_containers	✅
ask	13a_pending_node_selector_basic	✅
ask	14_pending_resources	✅
ask	15_failed_readiness_probe	✅
ask	17_oom_kill	✅
ask	19_detect_missing_app_details	✅
ask	20_long_log_file_search	✅
ask	24_misconfigured_pvc	✅
ask	24a_misconfigured_pvc_basic	✅
ask	28_permissions_error	🚧
ask	39_failed_toolset	✅
ask	41_setup_argo	✅
ask	42_dns_issues_steps_new_tools	⚠️
ask	43_current_datetime_from_prompt	✅
ask	45_fetch_deployment_logs_simple	✅
ask	51_logs_summarize_errors	✅
ask	53_logs_find_term	✅
ask	54_not_truncated_when_getting_pods	✅
ask	59_label_based_counting	✅
ask	60_count_less_than	✅
ask	61_exact_match_counting	✅
ask	63_fetch_error_logs_no_errors	✅
ask	79_configmap_mount_issue	✅
ask	83_secret_not_found	✅
ask	86_configmap_like_but_secret	✅
ask	93_calling_datadog[0]	✅
ask	93_calling_datadog[1]	✅
ask	93_calling_datadog[2]	✅

Legend

• ✅ the test was successful
• :minus: the test was skipped
• ⚠️ the test failed but is known to be flaky or known to fail
• 🚧 the test had a setup failure (not a code regression)
• 🔧 the test failed due to mock data issues (not a code regression)
• 🚫 the test was throttled by API rate limits/overload
• ❌ the test failed and should be fixed before merging the PR