Python 3.11 - 3.13 Line number fixes

[2elli]

At some point line numbers for these versions were messed up, not sure exactly what happened. I have been trying to test more and across multiple versions so these issues don't arise again.

Fixes:

• Line number inaccuracies for 3.11-3.13.
• Instructions that index into the co_localsplusnames table were not being parsed correctly. Previously we recreated the table by adding varnames to cells without resolving duplicate items that may occur in both tables.

[2elli]

@rocky From my understanding, there are some tests that cover code object members like the line tables in pytest/test_std.py, but they need to be updated for newer versions. Should these be updated and integrated into make check or make check-full?

I have mostly been testing manually and with make check / make check-full. The make tests seem to not cover some cases like the line table. If this is a misunderstanding of how xdis tests should be ran on my part, some guidance on how to better test would be greatly appreciated.

[rocky]

@rocky From my understanding, there are some tests that cover code object members like the line tables in pytest/test_std.py, but they need to be updated for newer versions. Should these be updated

Yes, when I run the tests I see

pytest/test_std.py::test_findlabels SKIPPED (Python 3.10 and above doesn't have branches in this code) [ 86%]

which seems clear enough what was up there.

and integrated into make check or make check-full?

Yes, please.

I have mostly been testing manually and with make check / make check-full. The make tests seem to not cover some cases like the line table. If this is a misunderstanding of how xdis tests should be ran on my part, some guidance on how to better test would be greatly appreciated.

make check and make check-full(or withremake`) is how I run them too.

Thanks for the PR and the work. Please give me a couple of days to get to this. Things have been a bit busy recently.

[rocky]

Looks very good. Thanks for doing this.

"black" wants to reformat "bytecode.py", but I will do that after the merge.

Sorry for the delay. I wanted to make sure I understood what's up here.

[2elli]

Thanks @rocky!