Compatiblity with 'Populate Transitions' ros2/rcl#1269 #495
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: SuperJappie08 <[email protected]>
Contributor
|
@emersonknapp can you review this? |
emersonknapp
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2025
Contributor
emersonknapp
left a comment
emersonknapp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems good to me.
Note: not a candidate for backport.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Compatibility with ros2/rcl#1269 and ros2/rcl_interfaces#185
Updates the
StateTransitionevent to reflect the changes made in the message.Is this user-facing behavior change?
Yes, the
timestampfield of theStateTransitionevent has been replaced withstampof typebuiltin_interfaces.msg.Time(instead of int).Did you use Generative AI?
No
Additional Information
Requires ros2/rcl_interfaces#185