-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
Add BaseImpl to rosidl_pycommon.interface_base_classes
#912
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: rolling
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Michael Carlstrom <[email protected]>
|
@mjcarroll I assume you have just been super busy with ROS CON and that you don't need anything from me. |
fujitatomoya
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm.
Adding a generic Impl type to BaseAction to improve typing and structure without affecting runtime behavior or APIs.
|
Pulls: #912 |
|
@mjcarroll did you build it with ros2/rosidl_python#241 as well? |
|
i do not think so, let me rerun the CI with it. |
|
Pulls: #912, ros2/rosidl_python#241 |
Description
Expands on #887 by providing a base class for Impl helper and adding another generic argument to
BaseActionIs this user-facing behavior change?
The public facing api should remain the same.
Did you use Generative AI?
Additional Information