Skip to content

Doc mods (label no-release-notes)#1574

Merged
praiskup merged 1 commit intorpm-software-management:mainfrom
jessp01:doc-mods
May 1, 2025
Merged

Doc mods (label no-release-notes)#1574
praiskup merged 1 commit intorpm-software-management:mainfrom
jessp01:doc-mods

Conversation

@jessp01
Copy link
Contributor

@jessp01 jessp01 commented Apr 29, 2025

Introduces some phrasing modifications, a few typo corrections and adds syntax highlighting (mostly for configuration blocks).

Add label no-release-notes - these changes all pertain to documentation files (under docs).

@jessp01 jessp01 changed the title Doc mods Doc mods (label no-release-notes) Apr 29, 2025
We come up with a nice feature. Mock will not install bootstrap chroot itself. Instead, it will download the container image, extract the image, and use this extracted directory as a bootstrap chroot. And from this bootstrapped chroot install the final one.

Using this feature, **any** incompatible feature in either RPM or DNF can be used in the target chroot. Now or in future. And you will be able to install the final chroot. You do not even need to have RPM on a host. So this should work on any system. Even Debian based. The only requirement for this feature is [Podman](https://podman.io/). Do not forget to install the `podman` package.
Using this feature, **any** incompatible feature in either RPM or DNF can be used in the target chroot. Now or in future. And you will be able to install the final chroot. You do not even need to have `rpm` on a host. So this should work on any system, even Debian-based ones. The only requirement for this feature is [Podman](https://podman.io/). Do not forget to install the `podman` package.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RPM seems fine here, it is used in the previous sentences.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @praiskup ,

My convention is this: RPM when referring to the project, rpm when referring to the binary:)

Cheers,

Copy link
Member

@praiskup praiskup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!
(I would prefer squash merge, will do tomorrow or so).

@jessp01
Copy link
Contributor Author

jessp01 commented Apr 30, 2025

HI @praiskup

(I would prefer squash merge, will do tomorrow or so).

Understood, just squashed the 4 commits now:)

@praiskup praiskup merged commit 839cdf0 into rpm-software-management:main May 1, 2025
19 of 25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants