- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 445
Fix module recursive lookup bug #1130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Closed
      
      
    
  
     Closed
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            2 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      
    File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              | Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | 
|---|---|---|
|  | @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ def test_module_extended | |
| m1_k1.add_include i1_k0_m4 | ||
|  | ||
| assert_equal [i1_m1, i1_m2, i1_m3, i1_m4, i1_k0_m4], m1_k1.includes | ||
| assert_equal [m1_m2_k0_m4, m1_m2_m3_m4, m1_m2_m3, m1_m2, m1, @object, | ||
| assert_equal [m1_m2_k0_m4, m1_m2_m4, m1_m3, m1_m2, m1, @object, | ||
| There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Test was wrong. [Mod1::Klass1, Mod1::Mod2::Klass0::Mod4, Mod1::Mod2::Mod4, Mod1::Mod3, Mod1::Mod2, Mod1, Object, Kernel, BasicObject]module Mod1
  module Mod3
  end
  module Mod2
    module Mod3
      module Mod4
      end
    end
    module Mod4
    end
    class Klass0
      module Mod4
        # module Mod5
        # end
        module Mod6
        end
      end
      module Mod5; end
      include Mod4
      include Mod5
      include Mod6
      include Mod1
      include Mod2
      include Mod3
    end
  end
  class Klass1
    include Mod1
    include Mod2
    include Mod3
    include Mod4
    include Klass0::Mod4
  end
end
p Mod1::Klass1.ancestors
# Actual
#=> [Mod1::Klass1, Mod1::Mod2::Klass0::Mod4, Mod1::Mod2::Mod4,      Mod1::Mod3,       Mod1::Mod2, Mod1, Object, Kernel,    BasicObject]
# Test was expecting
#=> [(omitted),    Mod1::Mod2::Klass0::Mod4, Mod1::Mod2::Mod3,Mod4, Mod1::Mod2::Mod3, Mod1::Mod2, Mod1, Object, (omitted), BasicObject] | ||
| 'BasicObject'], m1_k1.ancestors | ||
|  | ||
| m1_k2 = m1.add_class RDoc::NormalClass, 'Klass2' | ||
|  | @@ -96,6 +96,32 @@ def test_module_extended | |
| assert_equal [m1_m2_m4, m1_m2, m1, @object, 'BasicObject'], m1_k3.ancestors | ||
| end | ||
|  | ||
| def test_include_through_include | ||
| top_level = @store.add_file 'file.rb' | ||
|  | ||
| mod1 = top_level.add_module RDoc::NormalModule, 'Mod1' | ||
| mod2 = top_level.add_module RDoc::NormalModule, 'Mod2' | ||
| mod3 = top_level.add_module RDoc::NormalModule, 'Mod3' | ||
| submod = mod1.add_module RDoc::NormalModule, 'Sub' | ||
| mod2.add_include RDoc::Include.new('Mod1', '') | ||
| mod3.add_include RDoc::Include.new('Mod2', '') | ||
| mod3.add_include RDoc::Include.new('Sub', '') | ||
| assert_equal [submod, mod2], mod3.ancestors | ||
| end | ||
|  | ||
| def test_include_through_top_level_include | ||
| top_level = @store.add_file 'file.rb' | ||
|  | ||
| mod1 = top_level.add_module RDoc::NormalModule, 'Mod1' | ||
| mod2 = top_level.add_module RDoc::NormalModule, 'Mod2' | ||
| mod3 = mod2.add_module RDoc::NormalModule, 'Mod3' | ||
| submod = mod1.add_module RDoc::NormalModule, 'Sub' | ||
| mod2.add_include RDoc::Include.new('Mod1', '') | ||
| top_level.add_include RDoc::Include.new('Mod2', '') | ||
| mod3.add_include RDoc::Include.new('Sub', '') | ||
| assert_equal [submod], mod3.ancestors | ||
| end | ||
|  | ||
| def test_store_equals | ||
| incl = RDoc::Include.new 'M', nil | ||
| incl.record_location RDoc::TopLevel.new @top_level.name | ||
|  | ||
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found that this part is not correct. should use Module.nesting instead of
CodeObject#parentchain.But I think RDoc::Include and RDoc::Extend does not provide enough information.
This pull request and the original implementation uses
CodeObject#parentchain instead of module nesting.Complicated example