Skip to content

Conversation

@dmitrytrager
Copy link
Collaborator

What Issue Does This PR Cover, If Any?

Resolves #18

What Changed? And Why Did It Change?

Added basic CRUD actions for topics + archive option.
Provider specific listing is not implemented since it does belong to #19

How Has This Been Tested?

Using request specs

Please Provide Screenshots

Screenshot 2025-02-04 at 16 35 20 Screenshot 2025-02-04 at 16 35 26 Screenshot 2025-02-04 at 16 35 31

Additional Comments

  • used gen_random_uuid generator for uid since details were not specified
  • using integer state for topics, so "archived" is one of the states
  • since other states (except active/archived were not specified), this fields is not manageable: topic is always created active

@dmitrytrager dmitrytrager marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2025 15:48
@seanmarcia seanmarcia merged commit b58278c into main Feb 4, 2025
4 checks passed
@seanmarcia seanmarcia deleted the topic-model-18 branch February 4, 2025 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Topic Model Implementation

3 participants