chore: update callout of lookupfield of hubspot integration#2353
chore: update callout of lookupfield of hubspot integration#2353
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated UI guidance text in HubSpot destination configuration to clarify performance implications: unique properties enable batch upsert with higher throughput, while non-unique properties use slower search-based operations. The value is retrieved from event traits. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2353 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 72 72
Branches 8 8
=========================================
Hits 72 72 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
What are the changes introduced in this PR?
Update the callout of lookupfield to explain the behaviour of delivering data to HubSpot in the presence and absence of a unique field.
What is the related Linear task?
https://linear.app/rudderstack/issue/INT-5821/hubspot-update-lookupfield-tooltip-for-unique-property-requirement
Please explain the objectives of your changes below
Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here
Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?
N/A
Any new dependencies introduced with this change?
N/A
Any new checks got introduced or modified in test suites. Please explain the changes.
N/A
Developer checklist
My code follows the style guidelines of this project
No breaking changes are being introduced.
All related docs linked with the PR?
All changes manually tested?
Any documentation changes needed with this change?
I have executed schemaGenerator tests and updated schema if needed
Are sensitive fields marked as secret in definition config?
My test cases and placeholders use only masked/sample values for sensitive fields
Is the PR limited to 10 file changes & one task?
Reviewer checklist
Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?
Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation