Implement lockunspent method and test #278
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tcharding
reviewed
Jun 30, 2025
tcharding
reviewed
Jun 30, 2025
tcharding
reviewed
Jun 30, 2025
Expand client and test based on arg Use assert inplace of assert_eq
|
Implemented all the suggestions made. Thank you. |
tcharding
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The JSON-RPC method
lockunspentdoes return a type. We want to test this to catch any changes in behavior in future Core versions.This PR adds a client function that errors if the return value is anything other than the type it returns, along with an integration test that calls this function.
Ref: #116