Skip to content

Conversation

benma
Copy link
Contributor

@benma benma commented Jun 5, 2025

Was not sure if/when/how to implement it, when I noticed it's not needed at all.

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Heh, yeah, strange. This method dates to the original plan PR and AFAICT was never used. #592

This functionality also doesn't seem to make sense coming from the asset provider (we have methods on Descriptor to get taproot-related stuff now), and the doccomment is inconsistent with the actual API.

apoelstra
apoelstra previously approved these changes Jun 6, 2025
Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 4205294; successfully ran local tests

@apoelstra apoelstra merged commit a9888de into rust-bitcoin:master Jun 6, 2025
31 checks passed
@benma benma dismissed apoelstra’s stale review June 6, 2025 14:53

The merge-base changed after approval.

heap-coder added a commit to heap-coder/rust-miniscript that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2025
…ider::provider_lookup_tap_control_block_map

42052941e3c43494df97e7d8d195c078a550131b plan: remove unused AssetProvider::provider_lookup_tap_control_block_map (Marko Bencun)

Pull request description:

  Was not sure if/when/how to implement it, when I noticed it's not needed at all.

ACKs for top commit:
  apoelstra:
    ACK 42052941e3c43494df97e7d8d195c078a550131b; successfully ran local tests

Tree-SHA512: d0067ef38b5ad84a3d5ef66a437e60c1f6bec17c937ad758789308b981be8f0a20467f9288a8693acbd62893580989233cb85ba005ca57b8fcb59064edd598c6
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants