Skip to content

Conversation

radik878
Copy link
Contributor

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Thanks! But could you actually update this to 1.63 rather than 1.56.1? This crate might compile with 1.56.1 but that's below our MSRV and we haven't been testing it.

See #864 which fixed the same blog post broken link in the main crate for the correct URL.

@radik878
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! But could you actually update this to 1.63 rather than 1.56.1? This crate might compile with 1.56.1 but that's below our MSRV and we haven't been testing it.

See #864 which fixed the same blog post broken link in the main crate for the correct URL.

Thanks for review, I updated to 1.63

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Please remove the merge commit and squash your link-editing commits into one.

@radik878 radik878 closed this Oct 13, 2025
@radik878 radik878 deleted the fix-broken-link branch October 13, 2025 15:48
@radik878 radik878 mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2025
apoelstra added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2025
573fb55 docs: fix broken link (radik878)

Pull request description:

  https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/02/27/Rust-1.56.1.html - old
  https://blog.rust-lang.org/2022/08/11/Rust-1.63.0/"><img alt="Rustc Version 1.63.0+ - new, actual
  reopen #869


ACKs for top commit:
  apoelstra:
    ACK 573fb55; successfully ran local tests


Tree-SHA512: 401366e6fb2f422ddfa79e235b5c00403edaabd2c521f5ad394e769f410870d3cf56f6f79c1d328c75dada4778deed4e836eff99a63f0742398b556f5cac95bf
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants