Skip to content

Conversation

rami3l
Copy link
Member

@rami3l rami3l commented Mar 2, 2025

Following rust-lang/rustup#4204, this is the 3rd PR in the stable release process of rustup v1.28.0, as per https://rust-lang.github.io/rustup/dev-guide/release-process.html.

I'm first creating this as a draft to avoid it being accidentally merged before the actual release process starts.

cc @rust-lang/rustup

Rendered

@rami3l rami3l force-pushed the post/rustup-1-28-0 branch from 1551d63 to 9da9993 Compare March 2, 2025 15:03
@rami3l rami3l requested a review from djc March 2, 2025 15:11
@ChrisDenton
Copy link
Member

I mentioned on discord that rustup releases can come with problems not caused by rustup itself but just due to having a new release.

  • Anti-malware scanners blocking rustup or stopping it from creating or copying files (especially a lot of small files like html docs).
  • CI issues before the hosted version is updated across all runners. Because rustup seldom updates, people rarely get a chance to test this situation.

Perhaps there should be a short section mentioning known issues like this?

@rami3l
Copy link
Member Author

rami3l commented Mar 3, 2025

@ChrisDenton Yes, you're right. The CI self-update mitigation is implemented in v1.28.0, which means, unfortunately, the existing v1.27.1 will have problems updating to the new version.


Update: The post now includes a new ## Caveats section.

@rami3l rami3l force-pushed the post/rustup-1-28-0 branch from 55c820a to 6ec5526 Compare March 3, 2025 02:13
@rami3l rami3l force-pushed the post/rustup-1-28-0 branch from 6ec5526 to 2d20a97 Compare March 3, 2025 02:15
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum marked this pull request as ready for review March 3, 2025 13:03
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum merged commit eee44fd into rust-lang:master Mar 3, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants