Skip to content

Revise bootstrap sequence redesign blog post to clarify no observable impact for distro packagers #1626

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2025
Merged

Revise bootstrap sequence redesign blog post to clarify no observable impact for distro packagers #1626

merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2025

Conversation

jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu commented May 30, 2025 •
edited by rustbot
Loading

To clarify no observable impact are expected for distribution packagers, as this was reported to be confusing in #general > FYI: Bootstrap sequence redesign @ 💬.

Changes:

  • Added a revision entry.
  • Duplicated example on what a Rust toolchain can be built with (prior stable, prior stable point releases, same stable) in TL;DR section to make it more prominent.
  • Added a FAQ entry to explicitly spell out that no observable changes should be experienced by distribution packagers.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

Rendered

@jieyouxu
Revise bootstrap sequence redesign blog post
74d4310 
To clarify no observable impact are expected for distribution packagers.
eli-schwartz
eli-schwartz approved these changes May 30, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@eli-schwartz eli-schwartz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, this clarification looks like exactly what I was hoping for.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum merged commit ed715dd into rust-lang:master May 30, 2025
5 checks passed
@jieyouxu jieyouxu deleted the revise-stage0 branch May 30, 2025 02:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum approved these changes

@workingjubilee workingjubilee workingjubilee approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@eli-schwartz eli-schwartz eli-schwartz approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jieyouxu @Mark-Simulacrum @eli-schwartz @workingjubilee