Correct repr(Rust) overlapping fields rule for enums and unions #1704
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
CI broken, presumably by rust-lang/rust#134672.
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (possibly acd6794) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
This is handled in #1654 btw. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As currently written, the reference seems to say that the fields of a
repr(Rust)union do not overlap, and that all fields of an enum do not overlap, which is not true. It looks like this line in the reference was written for structs only, but it actually applies to all three kinds of type so needs adjustment.