Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
57 changes: 10 additions & 47 deletions clippy_lints/src/implicit_saturating_sub.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -107,9 +107,7 @@ impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for ImplicitSaturatingSub {
}) = higher::If::hir(expr)
&& let ExprKind::Binary(ref cond_op, cond_left, cond_right) = cond.kind
{
check_manual_check(
cx, expr, cond_op, cond_left, cond_right, if_block, else_block, &self.msrv,
);
check_manual_check(cx, cond_op, cond_left, cond_right, if_block, else_block, &self.msrv);
}
}

Expand All @@ -119,7 +117,6 @@ impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for ImplicitSaturatingSub {
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
fn check_manual_check<'tcx>(
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
expr: &Expr<'tcx>,
condition: &BinOp,
left_hand: &Expr<'tcx>,
right_hand: &Expr<'tcx>,
Expand All @@ -130,26 +127,12 @@ fn check_manual_check<'tcx>(
let ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(left_hand);
if ty.is_numeric() && !ty.is_signed() {
match condition.node {
BinOpKind::Gt | BinOpKind::Ge => check_gt(
cx,
condition.span,
expr.span,
left_hand,
right_hand,
if_block,
else_block,
msrv,
),
BinOpKind::Lt | BinOpKind::Le => check_gt(
cx,
condition.span,
expr.span,
right_hand,
left_hand,
if_block,
else_block,
msrv,
),
BinOpKind::Gt | BinOpKind::Ge => {
check_gt(cx, condition.span, left_hand, right_hand, if_block, else_block, msrv);
},
BinOpKind::Lt | BinOpKind::Le => {
check_gt(cx, condition.span, right_hand, left_hand, if_block, else_block, msrv);
},
_ => {},
}
}
Expand All @@ -159,7 +142,6 @@ fn check_manual_check<'tcx>(
fn check_gt(
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
condition_span: Span,
expr_span: Span,
big_var: &Expr<'_>,
little_var: &Expr<'_>,
if_block: &Expr<'_>,
Expand All @@ -169,16 +151,7 @@ fn check_gt(
if let Some(big_var) = Var::new(big_var)
&& let Some(little_var) = Var::new(little_var)
{
check_subtraction(
cx,
condition_span,
expr_span,
big_var,
little_var,
if_block,
else_block,
msrv,
);
check_subtraction(cx, condition_span, big_var, little_var, if_block, else_block, msrv);
}
}

Expand All @@ -200,7 +173,6 @@ impl Var {
fn check_subtraction(
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
condition_span: Span,
expr_span: Span,
big_var: Var,
little_var: Var,
if_block: &Expr<'_>,
Expand All @@ -217,16 +189,7 @@ fn check_subtraction(
}
// If the subtraction is done in the `else` block, then we need to also revert the two
// variables as it means that the check was reverted too.
check_subtraction(
cx,
condition_span,
expr_span,
little_var,
big_var,
else_block,
if_block,
msrv,
);
check_subtraction(cx, condition_span, little_var, big_var, else_block, if_block, msrv);
return;
}
if is_integer_literal(else_block, 0)
Expand All @@ -245,7 +208,7 @@ fn check_subtraction(
span_lint_and_sugg(
cx,
IMPLICIT_SATURATING_SUB,
expr_span,
else_block.span,
"manual arithmetic check found",
"replace it with",
format!("{big_var_snippet}.saturating_sub({little_var_snippet})"),
Expand Down
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions tests/ui/implicit_saturating_sub.fixed
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -222,3 +222,14 @@ fn main() {
a - b
};
}

// https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13524
fn regression_13524(a: usize, b: usize, c: bool) -> usize {
if c {
123
} else if a >= b {
b.saturating_sub(a)
} else {
b - a
}
Comment on lines +230 to +234
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit late, but reading through #13524, shouldn't the fixed code be just } else { b.saturating_sub(a) } (old suggestion was almost correct but it was missing braces)?

The new suggestion adds more code instead of simplifying it like before (changes a 0 to saturating_sub instead of the whole if)? 👀

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did some more debugging, and yep, it was a mistake, #13542 is now open reverting this and implementing a more robust solution ❤️

}
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions tests/ui/implicit_saturating_sub.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -268,3 +268,14 @@ fn main() {
a - b
};
}

// https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13524
fn regression_13524(a: usize, b: usize, c: bool) -> usize {
if c {
123
} else if a >= b {
0
} else {
b - a
}
}
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion tests/ui/implicit_saturating_sub.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -185,5 +185,11 @@ LL | | i_64 -= 1;
LL | | }
| |_____^ help: try: `i_64 = i_64.saturating_sub(1);`

error: aborting due to 23 previous errors
error: manual arithmetic check found
--> tests/ui/implicit_saturating_sub.rs:277:9
|
LL | 0
| ^ help: replace it with: `b.saturating_sub(a)`

error: aborting due to 24 previous errors

8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.fixed
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ fn main() {
let b = 13u32;
let c = 8u32;

let result = a.saturating_sub(b);
let result = if a > b { a - b } else { a.saturating_sub(b) };
//~^ ERROR: manual arithmetic check found
let result = a.saturating_sub(b);
let result = if b < a { a - b } else { a.saturating_sub(b) };
//~^ ERROR: manual arithmetic check found

let result = a.saturating_sub(b);
let result = if a < b { a.saturating_sub(b) } else { a - b };
//~^ ERROR: manual arithmetic check found
let result = a.saturating_sub(b);
let result = if b > a { a.saturating_sub(b) } else { a - b };
//~^ ERROR: manual arithmetic check found

// Should not warn!
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,29 +1,29 @@
error: manual arithmetic check found
--> tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.rs:9:18
--> tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.rs:9:44
|
LL | let result = if a > b { a - b } else { 0 };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `a.saturating_sub(b)`
| ^ help: replace it with: `a.saturating_sub(b)`
|
= note: `-D clippy::implicit-saturating-sub` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::implicit_saturating_sub)]`

error: manual arithmetic check found
--> tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.rs:11:18
--> tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.rs:11:44
|
LL | let result = if b < a { a - b } else { 0 };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `a.saturating_sub(b)`
| ^ help: replace it with: `a.saturating_sub(b)`

error: manual arithmetic check found
--> tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.rs:14:18
--> tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.rs:14:29
|
LL | let result = if a < b { 0 } else { a - b };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `a.saturating_sub(b)`
| ^ help: replace it with: `a.saturating_sub(b)`

error: manual arithmetic check found
--> tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.rs:16:18
--> tests/ui/manual_arithmetic_check.rs:16:29
|
LL | let result = if b > a { 0 } else { a - b };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `a.saturating_sub(b)`
| ^ help: replace it with: `a.saturating_sub(b)`

error: aborting due to 4 previous errors