Skip to content

Conversation

@blyxyas
Copy link
Member

@blyxyas blyxyas commented Oct 12, 2024

Related to #13533, such and obvious mistake got pass my watch, quite embarassing :/

Revert #13533 and implement a more robust solution.

Revert "Fix span issue on implicit_saturating_sub
This reverts commit 140a127.

changelog: [lint_name]: Fix suggestion for if {} else if {} else {} cases

r? @y21

Revert "Fix span issue on `implicit_saturating_sub`"
This reverts commit 140a127.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 12, 2024
@y21
Copy link
Member

y21 commented Oct 13, 2024

Looks good now, thanks for getting to it so quickly :D

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 13, 2024

📌 Commit 2b562de has been approved by y21

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 13, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 2b562de with merge f883e28...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 13, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: y21
Pushing f883e28 to master...

@bors bors merged commit f883e28 into rust-lang:master Oct 13, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants