Skip to content

Clarify what enables r? in triagebot #835

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2025
Merged

Clarify what enables r? in triagebot #835

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2025

Conversation

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Apr 16, 2025 •
edited by rustbot
Loading

This makes it more precise after rust-lang/triagebot#1937.

Rendered

@Kobzol Kobzol requested a review from ehuss April 16, 2025 20:33
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 16, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 16, 2025
@Kobzol Kobzol mentioned this pull request Apr 16, 2025
Merged
ehuss
ehuss approved these changes Apr 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ehuss ehuss merged commit 14f2432 into rust-lang:master Apr 16, 2025
1 check passed
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the triagebot-pr-assignment branch April 16, 2025 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ehuss ehuss ehuss approved these changes

Assignees

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@Kobzol @rustbot @ehuss @Mark-Simulacrum