Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Appearance settings

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

Appearance settings

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

rust-lang / rust Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 13.7k
Star 106k

Code
Issues 5k+
Pull requests 806
Actions
Projects 9
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

some smaller DefiningOpaqueTypes::No -> Yes switches#121394

Merged

bors merged 15 commits intorust-lang:masterrust-lang/rust:masterfrom

oli-obk:define_opaque_typesoli-obk/rust:define_opaque_typesCopy head branch name to clipboard

Apr 4, 2024

Conversation Commits15 (15)Checks Files changed

Merged

some smaller DefiningOpaqueTypes::No -> Yes switches#121394
bors merged 15 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
oli-obk:define_opaque_types

Commits

Commits on Apr 4, 2024

Use `DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes` in diagnostics code
oli-obk
committed
use `DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes` in rustdoc
oli-obk
committed
Specialization already rejects defining opaque types
oli-obk
committed
Specialization can switch to `DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes` without having an effect.
oli-obk
committed
Use `DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes` where the new solver is unconditionally used already
oli-obk
committed
Use `DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes` since we are guaranteed to error already
oli-obk
committed
FRU remaining fields does not actually define opaque types
oli-obk
committed
Switch `can_eq` and `can_sub` to `DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes`
oli-obk
committed
Switch upcast projections to allowing opaque types and add a test showing it works.
oli-obk
committed
amend to Switch `can_eq` and `can_sub` to `DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes`
oli-obk
committed
Add some regression tests for opaque types and const generics
oli-obk
committed
Add regression test
oli-obk
committed
Allow defining opaque types when checking const equality bounds
oli-obk
committed
Effects are boolean consts and don't contain opaque types
oli-obk
committed
Add regression test
oli-obk
committed

Footer

© 2025 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.