Update cargo

[weihanglo]

14 commits in 0e3d73849ab8cbbab3ec5c65cbd555586cb21339..2928e32734b04925ee51e1ae88bea9a83d2fd451
2025-02-01 20:14:40 +0000 to 2025-02-07 16:50:22 +0000

• Simplify backtrack (Simplify backtrack cargo#15150)
• Don't use on Solaris libc::LOCK_* which were removed from libc in ver… (Don't use on Solaris libc::LOCK_* which were removed from libc in ver… cargo#15143)
• feat: emit error if package not found within workspace (feat: emit error if package not found within workspace cargo#15071)
• Make cache tracking resilient to unexpected files (Make cache tracking resilient to unexpected files cargo#15147)
• Small resolver cleanups (Small resolver cleanups cargo#15040)
• feat: add cargo pkgid support for cargo-script (feat: add cargo pkgid support for cargo-script cargo#14961)
• Suggest similar feature names on CLI (Suggest similar feature names on CLI cargo#15133)
• fix: Don't use "did you mean" in errors (fix: Don't use "did you mean" in errors cargo#15138)
• Fix changelog link (Fix changelog link cargo#15142)
• chore(deps): update rust crate rand to 0.9.0 (chore(deps): update rust crate rand to 0.9.0 cargo#15129)
• Remove the original changelog (Remove the original changelog cargo#15123)
• chore(deps): update rust crate gix to 0.70.0 (chore(deps): update rust crate gix to 0.70.0 cargo#15128)
• allow windows reserved names in CI (allow windows reserved names in CI cargo#15135)
• removed a word that was repeated (removed a word that was repeated cargo#15136)

[rustbot]

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

• These commits modify submodules.

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in src/tools/cargo

cc @ehuss

[weihanglo]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=1

[bors]

📌 Commit b14fb2d has been approved by weihanglo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit b14fb2d with merge d2f335d...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: weihanglo
Pushing d2f335d to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (d2f335d): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Our benchmarks found a performance regression caused by this PR.
This might be an actual regression, but it can also be just noise.

Next Steps:

• If the regression was expected or you think it can be justified,
  please write a comment with sufficient written justification, and add
  @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged to it, to mark the regression as triaged.
• If you think that you know of a way to resolve the regression, try to create
  a new PR with a fix for the regression.
• If you do not understand the regression or you think that it is just noise,
  you can ask the @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance working group for help (members of this group
  were already notified of this PR).

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.9%	[-2.9%, -2.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.5%	[-0.5%, -0.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.9%	[-2.9%, -2.9%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results (primary -2.6%, secondary 0.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.3%	[2.0%, 2.5%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.3%	[-3.3%, -3.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 778.886s -> 781.002s (0.27%)
Artifact size: 329.10 MiB -> 329.08 MiB (-0.01%)

[weihanglo]

Seems irrelevant

[Mark-Simulacrum]

Looks like noise to me on all 3 deltas, yes.