Skip to content

Conversation

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Jun 12, 2025

Even the local workspace ones, since they almost never change.

Also remove the manual CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 setting, it is set automatically by rust-cache.

r? @marcoieni

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 12, 2025
@Kobzol Kobzol force-pushed the citool-more-cache branch 5 times, most recently from f6b1558 to d49e8ad Compare June 12, 2025 05:11
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 12, 2025
@Kobzol Kobzol force-pushed the citool-more-cache branch from d49e8ad to b5f6cc9 Compare June 12, 2025 05:16
Even the local workspace ones, since they almost never change.
@Kobzol Kobzol force-pushed the citool-more-cache branch from b5f6cc9 to c279dda Compare June 12, 2025 05:18
@Kobzol
Copy link
Member Author

Kobzol commented Jun 12, 2025

Okay, no, it seems like rustc-cache fundamentally cannot cache local crates. Also, it looks like without tests, the caching itself is pretty much useless and it takes ~the same time as building things from scratch 🤦‍♂️ Well, let's keep things as they are then.

@Kobzol Kobzol closed this Jun 12, 2025
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the citool-more-cache branch June 12, 2025 05:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants