Remove TmpLayout in layout_of_enum #145387
Open
+9
−30
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
09a3846 from #103693 made LayoutData be owned instead of interned in
Variants::Multiple::variants1, so there's no need forTmpLayoutin layout_of_enum anymore, and we can just store the variants' layouts directly in the prospectiveLayoutDatas'variantsfields.This should have no effect on semantics or layout.
(written as part of #145337 but not related to the layout optimizations in that PR)
Footnotes
see line 1154 of
compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/mod.rsin the linked commit;Variants::Multiple::variantseffectively changed fromIndexVec<.., Layout<'tcx>>toIndexVec<.., LayoutData>where theLayoutDatas are not interned asLayouts (LayoutDatawas at the time calledLayoutS) ↩