Skip to content

Conversation

Xuanwo
Copy link
Contributor

@Xuanwo Xuanwo commented Mar 28, 2022

This PR intends to stabilize feature try_reserve_2, closes #91789

This PR will also replace the previous PR: #95139

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @kennytm

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 28, 2022
@Xuanwo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Xuanwo commented Mar 28, 2022

@rustbot modify labels: +T-libs-api

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 28, 2022
@Xuanwo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Xuanwo commented Mar 28, 2022

r? @dtolnay

Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do the stabilization of new APIs in a different PR than the new capacity-related guarantees. They will need two different libs-api FCP.

@dtolnay dtolnay added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 28, 2022
@Xuanwo Xuanwo force-pushed the stablize_try_reserve_2 branch from 5b68504 to 8d71a8d Compare March 28, 2022 02:24
@Xuanwo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Xuanwo commented Mar 28, 2022

Please do the stabilization of new APIs in a different PR than the new capacity-related guarantees. They will need two different libs-api FCP.

Updated.

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Mar 28, 2022

This is blocked on the FCP in #91789 (comment).

@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-author +S-blocked

@rustbot rustbot added S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 28, 2022
@dtolnay dtolnay removed their request for review April 20, 2022 02:53
@Xuanwo Xuanwo force-pushed the stablize_try_reserve_2 branch from 8d71a8d to 5d4b203 Compare June 16, 2022 01:29
@Xuanwo Xuanwo force-pushed the stablize_try_reserve_2 branch from 5d4b203 to 324286f Compare June 16, 2022 01:30
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jun 17, 2022

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 17, 2022

📌 Commit 324286f has been approved by dtolnay

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. labels Jun 17, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#95392 (std: Stabilize feature try_reserve_2 )
 - rust-lang#97798 (Hide irrelevant lines in suggestions to allow for suggestions that are far from each other to be shown)
 - rust-lang#97844 (Windows: No panic if function not (yet) available)
 - rust-lang#98013 (Subtype FRU fields first in `type_changing_struct_update`)
 - rust-lang#98191 (Remove the rest of unnecessary `to_string`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b516806 into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 17, 2022
@Xuanwo Xuanwo deleted the stablize_try_reserve_2 branch June 18, 2022 03:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tracking Issue for try_reserve method on more containers
6 participants