feat: adds support for ignores #1
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
btw - we need to update README for that - wanna send a PR ? cheers |
striezel
added a commit
to striezel-stash/rustsec-audit-check
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2023
Dates for the releases in the changelog are taken from the non- squashed commits of <rustsec#1>.
striezel
added a commit
to striezel-stash/rustsec-audit-check
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2023
This should have been done as part of rustsec#1.
pinkforest
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2023
striezel
added a commit
to striezel-stash/rustsec-audit-check
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2023
This should have been done as part of rustsec#1.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Copy of actions-rs#221 (and GothenburgBitFactory#1!) with one additional commit (dc56dc8).
This isn't strictly necessary -- the action will already follow
.cargo/audit.toml-- but as @pinkforest said elsewhere, sometimes being able to control things in an action separately from in-repo files is useful.