Skip to content

docs: update hyperlinks to point to evm-monorepo#1460

Merged
smol-ninja merged 3 commits intostagingfrom
docs/update-hyperlinks
Mar 17, 2026
Merged

docs: update hyperlinks to point to evm-monorepo#1460
smol-ninja merged 3 commits intostagingfrom
docs/update-hyperlinks

Conversation

@andreivladbrg
Copy link
Member

like this issue: #1459

these were outdated and need to be merged after we rename the repo

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 16, 2026

Walkthrough

This pull request updates README files in four packages (airdrops, flow, lockup, utils). Documentation links for security, contributing, and license files were changed from package-local paths to parent paths (e.g., ./SECURITY.md → ../SECURITY.md, ./CONTRIBUTING.md → ../CONTRIBUTING.md, ./LICENSE.md → ../LICENSE.md). Issue/discussion/PR links and GitHub Actions badges were updated to point to the centralized evm-monorepo and its workflows. The flow README also replaces an external Lockup URL with a relative ../lockup/ path. No exported or public declarations were modified.

Suggested reviewers

  • smol-ninja
  • PaulRBerg
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: updating hyperlinks to point to evm-monorepo, which is reflected consistently across all four README files modified.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is related to the changeset, referencing a specific issue and explaining that outdated hyperlinks need updating for a repository rename context.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/update-hyperlinks
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
airdrops/README.md (1)

88-89: Consider updating codecov badge to reflect monorepo structure.

The codecov badge still references sablier-labs/airdrops, while the GitHub Actions badge now points to sablier-labs/evm-monorepo. If codecov tracking has also moved to the monorepo, these badges should be consistent.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@airdrops/README.md` around lines 88 - 89, Update the codecov badge references
in README by replacing the repository path "sablier-labs/airdrops" with the
monorepo path "sablier-labs/evm-monorepo" for both the [codecov] and
[codecov-badge] URL tokens so they match the GitHub Actions badge and current
Codecov tracking.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@utils/README.md`:
- Around line 90-91: The badge reference [gha-badge] in README.md points to the
wrong repository; update the URL value currently using
"sablier-labs/evm-monorepo/actions/workflows/ci-utils.yml/badge.svg" to use this
repository's path instead (replace the owner/repo segment with the current repo
name) so the ci-utils.yml badge correctly reflects this repository's workflow
status.

---

Nitpick comments:
In `@airdrops/README.md`:
- Around line 88-89: Update the codecov badge references in README by replacing
the repository path "sablier-labs/airdrops" with the monorepo path
"sablier-labs/evm-monorepo" for both the [codecov] and [codecov-badge] URL
tokens so they match the GitHub Actions badge and current Codecov tracking.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 01baad7b-616e-4c70-af0c-e8e6f11fb1b2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 575a06d and 232dac4.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • airdrops/README.md
  • flow/README.md
  • lockup/README.md
  • utils/README.md

Comment on lines +90 to +91
[gha]: https://github.com/sablier-labs/evm-monorepo/actions
[gha-badge]: https://github.com/sablier-labs/evm-monorepo/actions/workflows/ci-utils.yml/badge.svg
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ci-utils.yml workflow exists

fd -t f "ci-utils.yml" .github/workflows/

Repository: sablier-labs/lockup

Length of output: 93


Update badge URL to reference correct repository. The workflow file ci-utils.yml exists, but the badge URL points to sablier-labs/evm-monorepo while the file is in the current repository. Update the URL to reference the correct repository.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@utils/README.md` around lines 90 - 91, The badge reference [gha-badge] in
README.md points to the wrong repository; update the URL value currently using
"sablier-labs/evm-monorepo/actions/workflows/ci-utils.yml/badge.svg" to use this
repository's path instead (replace the owner/repo segment with the current repo
name) so the ci-utils.yml badge correctly reflects this repository's workflow
status.

@smol-ninja
Copy link
Member

Why not raise a PR directly with staging?

@smol-ninja smol-ninja changed the base branch from docs/monorepo-readme to staging March 17, 2026 04:00
@smol-ninja smol-ninja merged commit b7729a2 into staging Mar 17, 2026
33 checks passed
@smol-ninja smol-ninja deleted the docs/update-hyperlinks branch March 17, 2026 04:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants