Merged
Conversation
majewsky
requested review from
Nuckal777,
SuperSandro2000,
VoigtS,
defo89 and
wagnerd3
as code owners
Nuckal777
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2025
Collaborator
Nuckal777
left a comment
Nuckal777
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Embedding client.Client in reconcilers still seems to be a community best practise. 👍
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The new staticcheck version added some quickfix suggestions.
FWIW, I'm on edge about the "r.Client.List -> r.List" replacement. In vpa_butler, there are significantly more replacements like this, so I would like to hear Erik's opinion before continuing there. If this replacement is not desired, it's probably best to disable QF1008 for these repos.