SIP-75: Allow single-line lambda after :

[odersky]

No description provided.

[SethTisue]

discussion: https://contributors.scala-lang.org/t/pre-sip-allow-single-line-lambdas-after/7258

[prolativ]

Do I get this right that with this SIP both snippets below would be valid syntax

fun: (x: Int) =>
  (y: Int) => x + y

fun: (x: Int) => (y: Int) => x + y

but the following would be invalid?

fun: (x: Int) => (y: Int) =>
  x + y

If so, was this intentional or maybe we should somehow take such curried lambdas into account?

[odersky]

@prolativ Good observation! I changed the proposal and the implementation to admit curried parameter lists.